ActiveCampaign reviews

3.6

67% would recommend to a friend

(98 total reviews)
avatar

Jason VandeBoom

67% approve of CEO

55% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

98 reviews

Reviews about "Compensation"

Return to all reviews
2.0
May 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Coworkers are kind. Remote work is nice.

Cons

Got a small annual raise despite being touted as a higher performer. Tired of living out this corporate dystopia where a company that does > $250m in revenue gives merit increases that can't even keep up with the rising cost of just living.

avatar
ActiveCampaign Response
2mo
Thanks for sharing this after more than five years here! Our talented employees and remote work are real strengths at AC, and we're glad those have been consistent for you. On the compensation piece, we review annually and benchmark against market data to ensure we're competitive. Also, compensation conversations continue past annual review cycles since we aim for high performers to feel valued and consistently growing. For prospective employees, we invite you to ask about how compensation is determined, what market benchmarking looks like, and how merit increases work. You should get specific answers about the process and what drives those decisions. If you have additional feedback, please share with your manager or HRBP. Thanks again!
5.0
May 4, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible Remote Work Supportive Managers Fair pay Recognition and Friendly Atmosphere

Cons

Can be fast paced and stressful Most impactful opportunities are in the US

avatar
ActiveCampaign Response
2mo
Thanks for sharing this after more than five years in Dublin! Flexible remote work, supportive managers, fair pay, and recognition are core to what we're trying to build at ActiveCampaign, and we're glad those have been consistent for you. You're right that the pace can be fast, especially when priorities shift quickly. We consistently work on protecting bandwidth during peak periods so work is challenging yet enjoyable. Also, we've been intentional about expanding strategic work and visibility across our global hubs. Your feedback on listening more to input from the team is valuable, especially as we grow our EMEA presence. For prospective employees in Dublin: Ask about career growth opportunities in EMEA, how strategic work gets distributed across regions, and what support looks like when the pace picks up. You should get honest answers about where we are and where we're headed. We appreciate you being here for awhile and contributing to what makes Dublin AC work!
2.0
Apr 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* good benefits (bluecross/blueshield is great in my area) * decent compensation overall because that is really the only carrot at higher levels * lots of freedom; there is no real control anywhere so if you are a self-driven person you can really thrive * My output is directly related to my drive - the harder I push the more impact I have because there is no structure * fantastic WFH options - I barely go to the office. Really really great in that regard, and I can basically do what I want with my time * equipment (like laptop/VPN/etc) are all really good, I have no issues * I will put DEI here because we still seem to value it in principle, which is good, but I have trouble seeing actual impact

Cons

* leadership is slowly recovering from the past 5+ years of poor decisions as we move to our new CPO/CTO...we are still suffering from past mistakes in a large way * engineering has no real structure at the high levels, we are expected to just kinda figure it out ourselves * AI is a huge push, if you are frustrated with AI grandstanding in general then you will be frustrated here * No professional development money for engineering...we cannot go to conferences or get training, it's explicitly banned by upper management for inexplicable reasons * there is no real accountability in our technical organization. You can miss alerts/pages even while on-call as primary and no one really bats an eye. Just say "I am away from my computer" and no one really cares or follows up and we don't do retros or investigations into incidents * we make big bets without any real backing data, and then act surprised when it doesn't work out * we have zero engineering structure around decisions or frameworks...we just let teams do whatever they want and then act surprised/defeated when those teams perform poorly or are blocked by their decisions because 'no one else can help them'. There's no accountability for poor decisions on language/framework * there is a ingrained sense of "I have no power" that is embedded at nearly every level of the organization. Teams frequently just say "I'm blocked" without even attempting to figure out their issue. We tolerate a lot of waste * engineering is largely white males, despite the DEI pushes we make The main issue is that there is zero engineering culture here. The previous CTO completely abdicated his responsibilities on that front. He was an 'ideas' guy, which basically meant 'I manage up, I do not care what my direct reports are doing'. He didn't care how his directors or managers behaved and in the end that ruined him. Multiple failed projects that were the direct result of his lack of oversight are what drove him out. The basic idea here is that AC does not care about basic engineering culture. If you say "I cannot figure it out" no one pressures you or says "you must figure it out". You can just kinda stop working on things and everyone in management says "Oh, that must be hard, let's pivot". The people that are capable of actually troubleshooting have mostly been pushed out. The remaining like-minded folks try to keep things going in the right direction but honestly there is no real reason to do so. You don't get better performance reviews, you can't get promoted, it's mostly a waste of time. We clearly do not hire anymore in the US for engineering, we are basically entirely offshore in Costa Rica and Poland. Management needs to fix the engineering culture, and fast, or things will continue to stagnate. I will end by saying that 'staff engineer' is basically the highest engineering position you can get here. There are ostensibly higher positions like 'principal' or 'distinguished engineer' but it is unclear what you need to do to get promoted to those. They are not defined anywhere. The real-world answer is "Make the CTO like you and he will promote you". There's really no other option. Don't join if you are at staff level and want to progress, there is no way forward. Join this engineering org if you are a mid-level dev that wants to get to staff level and then leave. There's no growth beyond that.

avatar
ActiveCampaign Response
3mo
Thanks for taking the time to write such a detailed review after more than five years here. The specificity, especially around engineering culture, accountability, and career progression, is the kind of feedback that helps us get better! You're right that benefits, compensation, remote flexibility, and equipment are solid. Those aren't things we take lightly, and we're glad they've worked for you! On the engineering culture and structure piece, you've called out opportunities that we're actively addressing, including establishing clear engineering frameworks, implementing structured on-call processes with actual accountability, defining career ladders beyond Staff Engineer (Principal and Distinguished roles now have documented criteria and expectations), and investing in engineering leadership development to create consistency across teams. On accountability and decision-making, what you're describing about teams saying "I'm blocked" without troubleshooting, lack of retros after incidents, and no framework for technical decisions is exactly what the new engineering leadership structure is designed to fix. We've implemented incident review processes, established architectural review boards, and set expectations around ownership and problem-solving. If those changes haven't reached your team yet or aren't being enforced consistently, then please inform your manager or team leadership. We're investing heavily in Active Intelligence because customers are asking for it and it's core to our market positioning! The AI work is additive to our core product, not a replacement, and it's directly tied to customer retention and expansion metrics we're tracking closely. We're proud to say that DEI isn't just a principle at ActiveCampaign. We've made specific investments in diverse hiring pipelines, interview training to reduce bias, and ERG support. For prospective employees: Ask about engineering culture, career progression beyond Staff, how technical decisions get made, and what accountability looks like on teams. You will get specific answers about frameworks, expectations, and actual examples. Thanks again for your feedback! If you have additional thoughts, please share them with your manager or HRBP.
Viewing 10 - 12 of 98 Reviews

Glassdoor has 542 ActiveCampaign reviews submitted anonymously by ActiveCampaign employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if ActiveCampaign is right for you.