Allen Institute reviews

3.5

51% would recommend to a friend

(183 total reviews)

Rui Costa

63% approve of CEO

48% positive business outlook

Allen Institute has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 183 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Allen Institute employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management & Consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

183 reviews
2.0
Sep 19, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The Institute is unique in its approach: instead of having many disparate labs allow doing things differently, it has them all unified in purpose and process. Big science gets done here par excellence The hours are great for science and no one is expected to put in more than 40 hours a week. Generous vacation hours and an excellent match on 401k contributions up to the federal limit! Great location and even better building. If you're not driving, it's no sweat getting here; you can even kayak into work. Always growing - I started when it was just around 350 employees and in two years we've hit 450 with still more to go. Cell Science is growing too. You get to meet World-class scientists every day and there's not a neuroscientist that hasn't heard of the Institute. Having a luminary in the field stop by for a lecture is old hat.

Cons

Low pay for RAs in the area and no visible efforts to ameliorate that other than the oft-commented, "we're looking into it". Turn-over can be high because of the the reasons of pay and also that we attract such high-quality candidates that many are off to med/grad school in 2 years or less. Not much room to progress as an RA. Sure you can keep on collecting a yearly 3% pay increase and the occasional promotion but any increase in scientific duties is severely hampered by the lack of a PhD. This explains internal rollover as employees change teams to keep searching for the "green grass". The Institute is trying to track RA3's towards management or science but we have yet to see what this means. Management can be poor because the Institute, like many other research orgs, it hires managers as scientists first and managers second. It feels like the good managers were purely incidental rather than deliberate (because so many of those with the title Scientist turn out to be better managers than the Managers anyways). I feel like the work that I do goes unnoticed and unrecognized by my manager who is more concerned with doing their own science and reporting numbers than being around enough to listen to what I have to say. Many RAs get burnt out by bad management and end up leaving science for good; I'm trying my hardest not to be one of them but I can't say I'm winning that fight.

1.0
Jul 11, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Compensation is slightly better than academic or university positions, although not enough given the housing and cost of living in Seattle. -Minimal grant funding ensures higher job security and considerably more money to accomplish goals. - Expectations on work hours are low compared to other scientific settings, making work life balance very good. The standard is being able to leave at 4PM everyday and work less than 8 hrs per day. No one works long hours, perhaps due to dissatisfaction with career track not providing any benefit to work harder.

Cons

-Level of job satisfaction and morale is very low. Scientists and research associates regularly discuss dissatisfaction. Scientists collectively have produced long lists of systemic issues and had to regularly meet with the chief scientific officer in attempts to resolve major problems. Many scientists regularly look for jobs in the tech industry and wish to leave biological research after working here. -There is a constant fear of having your scientific project cut and having years of work go to waste. Large departments such as the embryonic stem cell group have just been removed with almost no advance warning. -Scientific output is minimal given the resources. With few exceptions, most people that work here for many years and get very few publications or successes to put on their resume. It will hurt your career in many instances to work here versus somewhere else. -Many of the investigators and managers have no experience managing skilled staff and have strongly aggressive or antisocial personality types. - No career development track for scientists or research associates. Promotions are arbitrarily given without clear reasons other than being manager dependent.

1.0
Jun 27, 2018

Middle Management

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Extremely bright people are attracted to great cause and Paul Allen’s unlimited money makes for nice offices and toys.

Cons

CEO is horrible and the rest of mgmt are not far behind. How you can screw up a non profit with tons of money is baffling. Just backwards policies made by a bunch of control freaks with no leadership skills nor backbone to stand up to the tryrant ceo.

Viewing 10 - 12 of 183 Reviews

Glassdoor has 207 Allen Institute reviews submitted anonymously by Allen Institute employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Allen Institute is right for you.