employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Bryan University

Is this your company?

Bryan University reviews

3.9

78% would recommend to a friend

(143 total reviews)

Eric Evans

93% approve of CEO

72% positive business outlook

Bryan University has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 143 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Bryan University employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Education industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

143 reviews
2.0
Dec 12, 2016

Still learning the basics while trying to produce the extraordinary

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Tons of free food, activities, and a "family" atmosphere, managers are laxed [if they like you] and easy to work with, decent compensation and benefits.

Cons

Lack of direction, lack of follow through on little items, not understanding little things such as having the company name on the caller ID make a huge difference when cold calling students- 877 toll free as a CID will not get enrollments if the person is ducking bill collectors. The company will enroll any student despite the course catalog having explicit requirements. Students with no computer, no idea how to use a computer, or even compose then write a two line email, instead of referring them to obtain those skills and come back. Student's end up with a giant bill for courses that they are taking longer than needed to finish due to lack of preparation. It's not the schools fault that they do not have these skills, but when you do a "technology readiness" test with a person and tell them they passed, they assume they know all they need, not that their speed test passed and that's good enough for Bryan. The company does not provide fixed 401K/ IRA accounts, no tuition reimbursement, no employee discounts (which is sad cause they are thrown to education providers like rice on a wedding day!). For years I presented this information and was curbed each time. The number one issue is crappy computers so the solution was to provide them with enrollment- why did it take 6 years to implement? 6 years of nagging for something every other school has in place! The company does not conduct background checks, pre-employment screening or testing which is NOT a good practice when dealing with ID cards, SSN's, and other sensitive information. HR has lost employee files more times than I care to mention and as a result everyone had to reapply for their jobs each year for 3 years (2011-2014). The company is not consistent with educational requirements of staff. Those is positions requiring master's and higher have bachelors. Those in positions requiring associate's do not have them. Managers in certain departments have 0 experience in the department and no related education, yet the company thinks they are the best candidates for the job. There are no continuing educational credit requirements, which is scary since they are required for departments outside of education. The company has no quality assurance standards, but will have employees stalk your social media to report anything they do not agree with as being "hostile working environment" as a way to muddy employee records, but when you report ACTUAL incidents of hostility, the company does nothing (such as two employees on two different occasions attempted physical assault and being told to "adjust my management style". My question: When is it acceptable to be punched by an employee for asking if they are having an issue preventing them from addressing their share of the workload? As I mentioned this is a "family" environment meaning everyone is in your business. Sticking to yourself and avoiding the drama only puts you in more of the cross-hairs. It makes it uncomfortable to go to work to work, it's a giant clique of a company. But if you fit into the clique then it's the most wonderful, awesome place to work with plenty of busses to throw your fellow co-workers under if you mess up.

1.0
Mar 5, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Nothing, I cannot come up with anything good to say.

Cons

In 2011, when I started teaching at Bryan University the Health Information Management program was in candidacy to get CAHIIM accreditation. That never happened. It is now 2014, the school is still not accreditated. Students who graduated in 2012 with the hope of writing the RHIT exam will be left out in the cold. Poor management is the reason the school did not go forward and become accredited. There were three of good qualified AHIMA credentialed teachers on staff, more than cabaple of participating in the accreditation process who would have brought the school through accreditation. Instead the school left the accreditation in the hands of individuals who did nothing and they got nothing and the got rid of the AHIMA credentialed teachers. What does this say for company values?

1.0
Dec 10, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great mission statement as an ideal to aim towards. Good specialized programs with career focus.

Cons

The entire culture and climate is dictated by the immediate Manager who is given complete discretion and latitude to manage as they see fit. No true checks and balances are in place to ensure management is fair, ethical and congruent with the mission and vision of the school. Upper management at the top is either neglectful of the mistreatment of staff or ignorant and aloof of its own business practices. Heavy turnover with upper Management in Admissions. Usually a sign that the company either doesn't know exactly what they want or how to go about accomplishing their overall objective. Inconsistent direction. In admissions, they expect consistent results, yet the processes and direction are very inconsistent and changes with each manager running the department like their own business whether it resonates with the company's true character or not. Hopes of advancement are a lure in attempts to increase production and create departmental retention. Talk of growth and advancement are just that. Within almost 4 years of employment, 2 Reps out of 18 were promoted early on to management positions, there haven't been any since. It's a 'dead end' for growth within the company regardless of your effort and production. At first impressions, Bryan University has the appearance of having a different focus and unique perspective almost setting itself apart from all the other for-profit schools, but time will tell a different story. The school's focus on hitting the "sales goal", whether for profit or reinvestment in the company is all the same. My experience has been that Bryan University has a particular arrogance, neglect and a self-serving management at the top that seems to care about one thing, its image. Being a private, family owned and operated school you would expect more genuine warmth, better communication, more advancement opportunities for top performers and better treatment for those that share the vision and mindset of Bryan, especially when they put in an honest effort to help grow the company and build its reputation for the better. Not so!

Viewing 7 - 9 of 143 Reviews

Glassdoor has 148 Bryan University reviews submitted anonymously by Bryan University employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Bryan University is right for you.