CohnReznick reviews

3.6

59% would recommend to a friend

(1,405 total reviews)
avatar

David Kessler

78% approve of CEO

62% positive business outlook

CohnReznick has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 1,405 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The CohnReznick employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Financial Services industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

1K reviews
1.0
Oct 15, 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Due to various mergers and acquisitions, in addition to organic growth into new markets, CohnReznick is experiencing an incredible period of expansion. If you are hard-working and ambitious, and make solid connections with the right people, you will find lots of opportunity here. Although bonuses can leave a bit to be desired, annual pay raises are usually generous. During busy season, the firm provides dinner four nights a week as well as breakfast and lunch on Saturdays. Management does a good job of making sure the food is not the same night after night and that there is a good variety of items to choose from. Vegetarians, vegans, and those with food allergies will have their preferences looked after.

Cons

Check your ideas about work/life balance at the door. They will not apply here. Partners and managers have a fixation on billable time that is almost pathological, and this concern seems to trump all others. They set very ambitious billable hour goals for their seniors and staff to meet, but then pressure them to eat time (and shift time between clients) so that their engagements don't go over budget. During my last busy season at Reznick, I received the following emails from four different people on the very same day. To paraphrase: -- Partner A: You were one hour short of your billable hour requirement last month. Why aren't you billing enough time? -- Manager B: "Why are you billing so much time to my clients? You're making me look bad!" (exact quote) -- Partner C: Why didn't you finalize your time sheet yesterday? Our firm policy yadda yadda yadda... -- Senior Manager D: (addressed to the whole department) We're requiring everyone to work this Saturday and Sunday and bill a minimum of 20 hours over the weekend. In short, you are forced to play this game of "bill as much time as you can, but don't bill too much to anyone." It's a game that very few seem to master. In addition, almost all non-billable time (other than PTO and CPE) is highly scrutinized and frowned upon. The overall message that all of this sends seniors and staff is that they are viewed as little more than cogs in a machine to help generate revenue for the partners of the firm. This message is reinforced at almost every turn. Morale is incredibly low and turnover seems very high, even compared with other CPA firms. During recruitment, management likes to loosely throw around the buzz phrase "we work hard, but we play hard." Really, that just means that they work hard. Any perk they consider "play" is largely forced and done at a minimum of expense, and it shows. Manager busy season bonuses are paid in November of the same year, but senior busy season bonuses are delayed until the subsequent busy season (i.e., your bonus for busy season 2012 won't be paid until March 2013). A clever retention tool, but it has the downside of further demoralizing the group of staff on whom the work demands are often the greatest. Office politics is rampant and flagrant. I witnessed serveral instances of managers throwing administrative and professional staff under the bus in order to save face. It's also painful to watch managers regularly schmooze the partners (listening intently to their long stories, forcing a laugh at their jokes whether or not they're funny, etc.) in a shameless effort to advance their careers and make partner themselves. A rude and insulting client will have free reign to treat associates however he/she chooses, especially if their engagements are relatively easy and the client has a history of paying their fees in a timely manner. Overall, firm management has little idea how to properly motivate their staff (and relies mostly on negative feedback and fear), nor do they seem to care. Also, it is clear that management prioritizes billings and firm revenue over all else, including the health and well-being of their staff. This firm's reputation in the Atlanta market for being a sweatshop is richly deserved.

1.0
Mar 29, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are some good people who work there. There is plenty of work, for those willing to endure the environment.

Cons

Some members of management are unnecessarily nasty, rude, and condescending. During busy season, the atmosphere can be outright toxic. I don't miss it at all.

1.0
Sep 26, 2018

Sr. Manager

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

None. There are absolutely no positive to working here.

Cons

Possibly the worst managed firm in the history of managing anything. If you take away merger growth, they have negative overall growth this century. Leadership is notoriously incompetent and quality control is a joke. Most of the tax partners commit malpractice daily. In my tenure there was one technically capable tax partner and they fired him because he refused to do 1040s (he was a former EY National Tax partner).

Viewing 4 - 6 of 1,405 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,608 CohnReznick reviews submitted anonymously by CohnReznick employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if CohnReznick is right for you.