Sinking ship - Software Engineer Testlio Employee Review

1.0
Jul 19, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Testlio used to have a prestigious reputation so it might look good on your resume.

Cons

There are so many things wrong at the company that it’s impossible to list them all without sounding intentionally malicious. So instead know that two thirds of the product and engineering team has quit in the past 12 months. Make sure you ask the recruiter about that. By the way, the company doesn’t even provide a laptop for you. You have to buy it for your own money and you don’t get a full refund. Have you ever heard of an IT company that doesn’t provide working equipment?

avatar
Testlio Response
1y
Hello, Thank you for sharing your feedback and your concerns regarding our Product and Engineering Teams (we call this our Platform team). This is Bill Toulias, VP, Engineering at Testlio. To begin, here’s some important, transparent data meant to address your concerns about resignations. In the last 12 months, we’ve had approximately 50% attrition in the Platform team. This is ~2x our company average (as shared elsewhere, we average 5-6% per quarter). From close work with our people, including exit interviews, we believe that our evolution into a fully remote engineering organization, inclusive of closing our Tallinn office in October 2023, was a major driver for this higher chapter of attrition. We’ve since welcomed many talented engineers from multiple EMEA locations and have shifted to an exciting new way of democratizing product roadmap decisions via a focus on objective ROI quantification. We call this our Platform Advancement System and it’s operating in an efficient and effective way—intentionally without a product management function. Today, the Platform team is 25 people, ~12% of our total company headcount, and we currently have 4 positions open for new joiners. Your suggestion to ask about team dynamics during the recruitment process is well put. We encourage all candidates to have open conversations with our recruiters and hiring managers. In fact, a key step in our interviewing process is a discussion with candidates about their future team and the challenges of each role. It’s important to shape clear expectations and reach a joint consensus on the potential for fit. Regarding our equipment policy: as a remote full-time workforce spread across 40+ countries, we have moved away from a traditional laptop model. This was done to reduce logistical challenges and costs, given that we spend six figures annually on hardware. As of mid-2024, we provide all TestLions with the flexibility to use a laptop they already own or purchase a new one with an 80% reimbursement. After two years, people gain full ownership of their laptops. For all people who have been with Testlio for more than 2 years, we transferred 100% ownership of current company-owned laptops to the worker (with no expenses). And, we provide 80% reimbursement for a new laptop every 4 years. Meaning, that if you work for Testlio for six years, you are eligible to fully own 2 laptops at an 80% discount (company covered payment) over cost. We worked to put together a thoughtful laptop program, and truly believe that this is a win-win for everyone involved. Thank you again for your feedback. Kind Regards, Bill Toulias VP, Engineering

Explore other reviews about Testlio

5.0
Feb 3, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The renewed company focus allows teams to prioritize effectively and maintain alignment. The leadership team is grounded, motivated, and highly collaborative. The product strategy successfully embraces AI, positioning the company to define the future of AI testing.

Cons

The volume of organizational change over the past year was a bit high. While these pivots were clearly made to ensure both near and long-term success, so much change can lead to change fatigue. I believe that leadership maintaining the current level of transparency will be key as the org continues to stabilize under the new focus.

1.0
Jul 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There is no growth and learning.

Cons

- Management lacked consistency and long-term direction. Priorities often changed without clear communication. - Processes were not well defined and varied significantly from one project to another, creating confusion and inefficiencies. - Knowledge sharing was limited, making it difficult for new team members to get up to speed quickly. - Quality of leadership and technical expertise varied across projects and teams. - Heavy dependence on contractors resulted in frequent team changes and loss of project knowledge. - Documentation was often incomplete or outdated, requiring testers to spend extra time gathering information. - Career growth opportunities and promotion paths were not clearly defined. - Feedback and performance expectations were sometimes unclear. Project assignments could end abruptly with little notice, creating uncertainty for contractors. - Communication across multiple time zones could delay decisions and issue resolution. - Test environments and access management occasionally caused unnecessary delays. - Lack of standard QA practices across projects made it difficult to establish consistent quality standards. - Limited opportunities to influence product decisions since QA teams generally worked as external contributors rather than part of the client's core team. - Resource planning was sometimes reactive rather than proactive, leading to workload fluctuations.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All