employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Energy Solutions

Is this your company?

Energy Solutions reviews

3.4

61% would recommend to a friend

(35 total reviews)

Samuel D. Cohen

73% approve of CEO

56% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

35 reviews

Reviews about "Compensation"

Return to all reviews
4.0
Jul 30, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Supports working from home full time Supports flexible hours and flexible time off; it's very easy to take time off ad hoc and to start/end your work day based on your own scheduled The people that work here are overall smart, hardworking, and kind - it's a very pleasant and dedicated team to be part of

Cons

Compenstation, hours requirements, and time off benefits aren't competitive; the company has "no accrual PTO" for consulting staff such that you essentially are directed to work 2040 hours a year in order to get a very modest time off of 2 vacation weeks and 10 floating holidays Company doesn't make full commitments to decisions out of desire to appease everyone, which creates confusion Company keeps unoccupied offices open, wasting resources Company over rewards and over promotes low performing and mediocre senior leaders because they are experiences but holds back modest pay raises and promotions for high performing junior staff Company has no process to award merit-based raises not tied to a promotion; substantial raises only come with promotions; all other raises are annual cost of living raises

1.0
Jul 17, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Health care benefits were great -The entry level staff is unparalleled and made the decision to leave extremely challenging

Cons

-In March of 2024, a policy was introduced that "encouraged" team members to work 2040 hours a year with "4 weeks" of PTO. The 4 weeks included sick time, PTO and federal holidays and staff were told that to maintain 2040 hours + 4 weeks of PTO they should work 8.5 hours a day. This was said to not be a hard policy but when pressed on what would happen if staff did not meet this number, they were told it would be considered for pay increases and promotions. Members of leadership brought concerns to the director and C-suite level about retention and hiring but were gaslit and told that staff would not quit because they believe in the mission. As it stands now, staff have been leaving in droves and many more are searching for a way out. There are dozens of job postings on their website and the lack of staff has made it impossible for those that are left to maintain work/life balance. Employees that are left are stretched incredibly thin on extremely challenging projects with little to know support or consideration from director+ levels apart from being told that "it's good for the mission". -Upper management struggled prior to this 2040 policy implementation to meet DEI goals due to the elitist and out of touch people in charge. -Often times teams are encouraged to voice their opinions or concerns but these concerns will typically go unheard as Sam and Chris have no intention of driving change for the betterment of their staff if it goes against their archaic view of what it means to be an employer.

2.0
Jun 2, 2024

Disappointing

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A great mission, and excellent people on the ground trying to deliver that mission.

Cons

Immature leadership with unrealistic expectations including no recognized federal holidays in the PTO plan, and excessive work requirements that don't recognize the sacrifices people make to work for the company and the mission. Leadership does not communicate well, and is disconnected from the impact of their decisions and poor communication on employees. ES claims "non-accrual PTO" but publishes calculators and guidelines that are accrual based, so that it's clear that "non-accrual" is just a way to avoid compensating people for their work. Uncompetitive compensation and PTO packages. Misrepresents terms of employment. Does not deliver on commitments but expects employees to find ways to make them successful at a very high personal cost. Annual employment contracts set the terms for bonuses, but contracts are not delivered until the employment term is over (in December 2023 for the employment year), much too late to act on, so revealed as a ploy to avoid paying bonuses. I wanted to love working here. Work is never all fun, and leadership must always do things that aren't fully understood by employees on the ground. But the leadership team is amateurish, apparently incapable of maturing, does not listen to feedback, does not reward contribution, and appears to be less interested in the mission than in finding ways to avoid compensating their employees.

avatar
Energy Solutions Response
2y
We will continue to address the some of the growing pains you mention above such as addressing the misconception that working 2040 hours is a company requirement, rather than a target number. Our policy guarantees a minimum of four weeks paid time off.
Viewing 16 - 18 of 35 Reviews

Glassdoor has 116 Energy Solutions reviews submitted anonymously by Energy Solutions employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Energy Solutions is right for you.