employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Hendrickson

Part of Boler

Is this your company?

Hendrickson reviews

3.3

57% would recommend to a friend

(265 total reviews)
avatar

Matthew J. Boler

67% approve of CEO

54% positive business outlook

Hendrickson has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 265 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Hendrickson employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Manufacturing industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

265 reviews
5.0
Mar 18, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I have been working at Hendrickson since mid September 2013 and have to say that I could not have found a better place to work. There isn't a single person here that I do not get along with and everyone is so helpful. Even during a huge product launch it is so under control and everyone takes the right steps to achieve goals and keep a stress free environment.

Cons

I can not think of any cons for this awesome place to work. It is amazing and I hope I am here until retirement.

2.0
Sep 7, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Solid financially; great products and solid engineering capability. Many good people at Hendrickson and solid benefits.

Cons

Most people are stressed out and overworked. A few people (very few) in key leadership positions aren't leaders. That is a recipe for failure.

2.0
Apr 6, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Opportunity to do new things on different projects (see listing on 'Cons' section of review). Flexability (somewhat) with family concerns (as long as the work gets done on time). Chicago is a cool town.

Cons

Apparent inability for upper management to look at big picture. Projects are pushed through design/development process to meet timing established by marketing/sales with little or no regard to realistic timing (Oh we can sell this! Get it in production yesterday!! We'll figure out the design/engineering later.....). Chaos ensues. Engineers end up working on several projects at once that all have to be completed at the same time. Sticking with any sort of schedule for design and development of a product is unheard of. Poor training and mentoring of new employee's, especially those with less experience. Little or no depth of knowledge from an engineering perspective which results in a over reliance on those experienced engineers that remain. Burn out is a common problem at this company. While you are given the opportunity to do new things (see 'Pros' listing), you are expect to do so with little or no training. Sink or swim. If you succeed, its expected. If you fail, you should have worked harder. Overtime is expected. Typical work week for those in my department range in the 50-60 hours a week. No additional compensation. As a result CAD guys make more than most engineers as they are eligable for OT. Engineers are not. Keep this in mind when the topic of compensation is addressed. Pay raises are typically poor, regardless of how the company is doing financially. Usually not much more than the cost of living. This is commonly known throughout the engineering department not just one employee's opinion. Lack of any instiutional knowledge documentation on product design and/or development history. Problems that are solved today show up again in 2-3 years on the next update of the product. As the turn over at this company is high, whoever has the project is starting from scatch. Lack of standardization for process in design/development of product.

Viewing 25 - 27 of 265 Reviews

Glassdoor has 322 Hendrickson reviews submitted anonymously by Hendrickson employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Hendrickson is right for you.