Illumina reviews

3.3

46% would recommend to a friend

(2,557 total reviews)
avatar

Jacob Thaysen

53% approve of CEO

33% positive business outlook

Illumina has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 2,557 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Illumina employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

3K reviews
1.0
Mar 31, 2023

Strong distrust in senior leaders. Francis Needs to Go

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Direct management and team are intelligent, driven, and all around incredible people to work with. Most people VP and below are great and want to work hard and doing good things to make a positive difference in the world.

Cons

Francis and other C-levels appointed by Francis are not trustworthy. Who pays themselves double the same year they lay off 5% of the workforce? There are so many budget cuts that are not allowing us to fully do our jobs, and Francis gets an$14 Million pay raise?! For what?! We cannot even travel to visit our customers and product launches are constantly delayed due to limited budget and resources. Every team is under staffed and over worked. That $14M pay raise could have been used to staff up our teams and allow us to properly execute our jobs. Instead Francis is lining his already very large pockets with even more money? Makes absolutely no sense, seems very corrupt, and is totally inconsistent with Illumina values.

1.0
Jan 19, 2022

Undermaket pay

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great campus, good products, good intern program,

Cons

Most reviews with glowing messages are fake reviews by HR or severely underpaid but highly educated lab and bio PhDs and scientist who are exploited by the pharma and biotech industry due to the sheer supply of qualified employees. Middle management in this company specially i in GQO is either coasting as people manager with Zero real responsibility other than having meaningless 1-1 and quarterly performance review. It is mind numbingly inane to have 1-1 with managers when there is nothing to talk about as you are just numbers in his or her reporting chain for him to get promotion. Everyone knows and recognizes the situation. Performance enablement is a joke at Illumina. Irrespective of performance you will get 3 percent raise +/- 0.2. The dollar amount stays same but the percentage changes. Bonus at senior staff level is 10 percent...let that sink in for a second. And the pay scale is as follows Engineer 1 - 65k Engineer 2- 85k Sr engineer - 105k with 8 percent bonus Staff- 130k Sr staff- 155k Principal- 180k Company makes huge deal about stock grant. It is average at about 30 to 40k at senior and staff level and 50 to 60 k at sr staff level. This is below par compared to other companies and the stock price has gone nowhere over the last five years. Promotion raise is very low too. Prepare to be disappointed.

3.0
Oct 18, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Illumina makes great products and has enjoyed the first mover advantage. It’s a great place to be if you’re looking for experience while solving real world problems and working in a fast paced environment. Illumina also promotes people faster than other biotech companies and embraces new technology more frequently than its counterparts. It’s a fascinating place to be if you’re looking to make a difference. Francis de Souza, the CEO, embodies traits of a modern leader. During company meetings, he speaks thoughtfully and comes across as caring. Aimee Hoyt, the Chief People Officer, has tried to put in policies that demonstrate a culture of care for employees. For example, during the Covid pandemic, the company has provided one time Covid care packages to all employees.

Cons

1. Unrealistic timelines - the common joke at illumina is “all deliverables were due yesterday.” 2. Too much work - this ties in with unrealistic timelines. Among colleagues, we often talk about how much work we have on our plates, and it feels overwhelming to have so much work all the time. It often feels like no matter how much you get done, there’s always more to do. In a way, this is a good problem to have. But, we often talk about being overworked at ILMN. And, in times like Covid, the situation is exacerbated. Those who work hard are working even harder. At the same time, there’s a lot of dead wood that’s sitting around without any accountability that needs pruning. Another joke among colleagues is “it is very hard to get fired at Illumina these days” unless you do something terribly wrong (e.g. sexual harassment or something similar). In other words, doesn’t matter if you don’t work, you won’t get fired even if you don’t produce outcomes as long as you’re putting in your 9-5. This is not good for a company that wants to continue as the market leader in the genomics space. 3. Meeting obsessed work culture - ah, so many meetings. Way too many. A lot! Think back to back meetings starting 8 am all the way till 6:30 or 7 pm, almost every day, and without breaks. Sometimes, there’s no time to eat and/ or take a bio break or stretch. This has been exacerbated further during the pandemic. During my decade long career, I’ve never before (ILMN) worked at a company so obsessed with meetings. People often come to meetings without a set agenda of what they want to accomplish. And, then often these meetings end with no meaningful outcomes/ actions/ decisions. Which means, there’s often a need for follow up meetings. This is hugely inefficient. Maybe, this is endemic to my work groups/ colleagues. But, I work with a lot of cross functional teams within GQO, and this is definitely prevalent. 4. A PowerPoint obsessed work culture - everything that needs discussion is thrown on a PowerPoint. The amount of time people spend on preparing PowerPoint presentations is outrageously high. And, at what cost to the company? One can only dare wonder because this is prevalent across all levels with the company. Such “busy-work” must be discouraged. Maybe, we can learn from Amazon where PowerPoint presentations are banned. 5. Overlapping job functions across teams - GQO is the worst org within Illumina when it comes to fostering overlap. Multiple teams of people across different groups often trying to do the same things creates duplication of effort and a sense of uneasiness in work relationships. It fosters confusion, and a sense of unhealthy competition and jealousy because everyone wants to do the next big NPI project, as if there life depends on it. People often show off their involvement in the next NPI project to others. 6. Issue Flavor of the week - there’s always a burning issue during any given week. Most people gravitate towards the issue flavor du jour, meet a bunch of times on it and then are quick to move on to the next burning topic without ensuring resolution. As a result, a lot of issues/ problems resurface from time to time because they were never resolved in a structured way the first time around. All this creates a lot of noise and distractions which makes it difficult to focus. 7. Persistent disconnect between executive leadership in GQO and ground reality - it appears as if leadership in GQO is not in touch with the ground game, especially at HQ. There’s a lot of talk about SD One culture, but GQO leadership is removed from the realities on the ground. It’s a bit of a boy’s club, where people scratch each other’s backs and go on offsites. And, non performing leaders are able to escape scrutiny and accountability on outcomes when projects are delayed. People who work hard, who produce outcomes are often not well supported, and then there are some departments (e.g. FoF) that enjoy protection from accountability for God knows what reason. A lot of FoF led projects are delayed. But, there’s no accountability. On the contrary, such departments also end up getting more resources because they’re “delayed” with their deliverables and need help to push things past the finish line. By contrast, those teams that consistently demonstrate strong work ethic of delivering more with fewer resources suffer the most in such an environment. They’re denied access to resources because there’s only so much money in the company pot to draw from. Accountability is key if Illumina desires to stay competitive in the long run. Those who perform to produce desirable outcomes must be rewarded by giving them more resources to achieve even more results. Those departments/ work groups that don’t produce timely outcomes must not be given more resources. Such a culture is very demotivating to those groups that strive to excel and produce timely outcomes while dealing with resource constraints and aggressive timelines.

Viewing 7 - 9 of 2,557 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,968 Illumina reviews submitted anonymously by Illumina employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Illumina is right for you.