employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Institute For Humane Studies

Is this your company?

Institute For Humane Studies reviews

3.3

49% would recommend to a friend

(45 total reviews)
avatar

Emily Chamlee Wright

78% approve of CEO

56% positive business outlook

Institute For Humane Studies has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 45 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Institute For Humane Studies employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Nonprofit & NGO industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

45 reviews
1.0
Jun 2, 2017

Senior Management, you have a problem

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There were some genuinely good and skilled colleagues at IHS when I worked there. All of them were in the junior ranks though and most of them quit or were fired within a year.

Cons

IHS has two types of people: 1. The staff. They're good people by the most part and have lots of enthusiasm. But they're all junior people who have very few decision rights and equally little job security. The hours aren't terrible but they lowball you on pay even for non-profit standards. These issues combine into a MASSIVE turnover problem that others have mentioned. Competent people are usually either driven away because their work is stifled, or they are laid off due to the mistakes of the organization's Senior Management. That brings us to 2. the Senior Management. They're all paid six figures. What do they do other than collect salary? Well that's the actual mystery. It seems to be sitting around and reading management-speak books that the CEO is obsessed with and taking cuts out of the money that the Kochs and other rich donors give them. They operate as an insular little clique though and all their communications with the rest of the staff are like staged sales pitches. Orwellian doublespeak is rampant. Also meaningless buzzwords. But they don't appear to actually *do* anything that's real work. That all gets pawned off onto the staff. Unlike the staff, the Senior Management is untouchable. Actual job qualifications are meaningless among them. Instead it's all those who are promoted out of positions they screwed up and blamed on somebody else. Those who are friends/favorites/spouses of the right people on top. Some are practically invisible - they "work remotely" and even the regular staff who work under them don't even see them for weeks on end. Whenever a Senior Manager screws up, they shove the blame onto somebody further down the food chain. Then mass layoffs happen to perfectly good people on the junior staff. Sometimes it's deeply unethical. One time when I was there they ran a deficit because of all the waste in the top of the organization. Did the person whose fault it was get blamed? No. They just dumped a few jr. staff like it was no big deal. Another time they fired a guy a week after he came back from medical leave due to a serious illness. Whenever anyone asked or hinted this was wrong, all you got was more doublespeak. Canned answers. Non-protected people aren't fired from IHS - they're "disappeared" and everyone else is supposed to be quiet about it like it's no big deal. All of this does horrors for morale. It makes the regular staff into emotional wrecks. Good people leave because they can't stand the stress, the canned messages, the doublespeak - sometimes only after a few months. They shed several DOZEN of people in under 2 years while I was there. It's only continued since then from what I'm told. It's probably at LEAST a 40 percent turnover from when I started a few years ago to now. And worst of all nothing ever changes. The Senior Management just pretends this is all normal. And when it screws up it blames somebody junior and "disappears" them too. Lather, Rinse, Repeat.

1.0
May 11, 2017

Office Support

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Vacation policy, dress code, tuition waiver.

Cons

Lack of diversity, high attrition, unclear mission. Upper management is compensated well, junior staff is not.

3.0
Oct 24, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Everyone is pretty friendly and its great that everyone is so like-minded. I made some good friends my time at IHS. Working with liberty-minded professors and graduate students was very fulfilling.

Cons

OVER WORKED and UNDER APPRECIATED is the biggest con of mine. There was a period of two-three weeks where I had to take on more work than usual due to a team member leaving. During that time I would start work at 5 or 6 AM and didn't end my day until 10-11 PM. When I finally finished the work I took on I asked my supervisor if I could take a day off during the week (to catch up on sleep) she denied my request. Employees at IHS are way too over worked and it was not just me. It makes employees (especially lower level employees) hate their work (even though close to everyone at IHS is passionate about liberty). It doesn't help that IHS has a huge turnover rate (around 25% or more). Employees either leave due to being over worked and underpaid or are fired due to getting on the wrong side of someone who is in management. There are certain people in management who are insulated from getting fried or criticized even if they forget to complete important responsibilities for a program. For a organization who pride themselves on adhering to libertarian values, they are not very libertarian in practice. Market based management goes out the window. Another con I have is the number of supervisors I had when I worked at IHS. If I was currently working there I would be on m 5th supervisor. Not too stable of a work environment.

Viewing 13 - 15 of 45 Reviews

Glassdoor has 50 Institute For Humane Studies reviews submitted anonymously by Institute For Humane Studies employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Institute For Humane Studies is right for you.