MOO reviews

2.8

42% would recommend to a friend

(250 total reviews)
avatar

Richard Moross

38% approve of CEO

28% positive business outlook

MOO has an employee rating of 2.8 out of 5 stars, based on 250 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The MOO employee rating is 27% below average for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

250 reviews
1.0
Sep 15, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Free lunch on a Friday Free beer/wine on a Friday Free breakfast, fruit, tea and coffee every day Great Christmas party Fairly relaxed on when you arrive in the morning

Cons

Management, HR and some employees are far too fake for my liking. I prefer working with people who tell it like it is. I worked in the marketing team and there was no real leadership, a lack of team-work and no sense of camaraderie when I was there. No support/encouragement from management. Little to no contact with anyone other than direct line manager. Disparity in the way that different teams worked and were managed. For example, the tech team often complained of being bored and having nothing to do whilst the design team always seemed to be stacked. High staff turnover - since I was made redundant, numerous others have left too (whether through their own choice or via redundancy). MOO seem happy to adopt a hire and fire approach and will happily get rid of people when they no longer serve a purpose in their eyes.

1.0
Apr 18, 2026

Proceed with caution

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Hybrid working: You are able to work from home for part of the week. Available for majority of employees, except the warehouse teams who, understandably, are required to be on site. Perks: Pension, health care and 'work from anywhere' scheme are perks most employees will enjoy and benefit from.

Cons

Lack of confidence in leadership and constant threat of redundancy: 2020 marked the beginning of the end for MOO. Key players across the global team were cut, either replaced poorly or not at all. Senior leadership appeared panicked, directionless, and any belief in a positive future quickly vanished. With leaders constantly coming and going, it’s clear things aren’t healthy. Everyone worries about job security. The scale of redundancies is staggering. I can’t quite believe how many lives have been destroyed by restructuring at MOO. It makes me sick to think about what’s happened (and what’s still happening) to former colleagues. How poor can our forecasting be if redundancies are needed year after year? This is not normal. Meanwhile competitors have advanced over the past six years, and MOO seems confused as to why it’s underperforming. There’s a widespread feeling internally that MOO is a sinking ship. Mind-numbing frustration: There is real talent across teams, which makes it even more frustrating to see people held back by senior leadership. Mistakes happen but the face mask project, as a response to covid, was beyond a joke. It took too long to produce, and most employees strongly opposed it from the start. We design and print stationery and merchandise, not PPE. Time and energy should have gone into products that could have actually moved the business forward. Nobody senior wants to listen: Teams sit on years and years of valuable customer feedback ranging from products they’d like us to create, size and colour options they’d happily buy, to improvements to the packaging and the website, but Commercial leadership makes no effort to tap into it. There are painstakingly obvious decisions that need to be made, which all teams can see clearly, but leadership are closed off. I remember a time where leadership deemed exploring TikTok as a marketing tool a waste of resources. Now guess which social media platform the company is creating content for? It’s no surprise that even those who have not been affected by redundancies still choose to leave. That alone says everything. Nobody feels heard. Nobody feels their opinion counts. Nobody feels their ideas are valued. Inequality and favouritism: Customer-facing teams are under immense pressure, with their days scheduled to meet a number of goals and SLAs, yet they are often the first to be cut. We are told volume-based teams are impacted due to targets not being met but somehow other teams including Brand, Creative and Social rarely face the same consequences when their efforts aren’t successful. I don’t wish redundancy upon anyone, but it does not seem fair that some teams are protected and given second chances, whilst other teams are culled time after time for reasons out of their control. It is baffling that employees who have spent years building customer relationships are let go because orders are down, when if the company were to suddenly have a surge in orders or projects, the newly-tightened teams would not have enough capacity or bandwidth to deliver successfully. Promotions are inconsistently applied. Some teams fight endlessly for deserved progression and get nowhere, while others move up rapidly with little resistance. The disparity is glaring and it does not take a genius to spot that it is the same teams being promoted each cycle. All departments should have an equal and equitable experience at MOO but even basic differences stand out: Customer Service are glued to their desks and get a 30-minute lunch break, while all other teams get a full hour. Some teams can even operate with complete freedom and leave for a canal-side coffee break whenever the mood strikes. The imbalance is hard to ignore, and it’s hard not to feel that certain groups are consistently favoured. The shift to making certain teams almost completely redundant whilst rehiring in Cape Town highlights this further. Many roles you’re seeing advertised aren’t new, they’re replacements for employees in Denver, East Providence, and London who’ve been let go. I feel so sorry for the new Cape Town hires who are entering teams stripped of experience, history, and customer understanding. They are also joining at a time when morale is yet again extremely low. I genuinely wish them well and hope they get the support needed. Culture has been lost and now it feels forced: MOO once had a genuine, thriving culture. People enjoyed spending time together. Now culture-growing budgets are minimal or nonexistent (I will never forget the year London’s Christmas party was BYOB). Culture does not require huge spending, but it does require effort all round, and that is missing. Long-tenured employees often avoid social events altogether as anyone they would have called a friend has been made redundant. I witnessed a handful of employees attempt to rebuild culture through various initiatives, but I believe this was off the clock or on a volunteer basis. There is no visible support from senior leadership. Lack of care: I was let go while using mental health services through the company’s health insurance. Not once did someone check whether I was dependent on those services, they were simply terminated on my last day of employment. Company values mean nothing: Employees are expected to embody the MAKEIT values (Make it sustainable, Always deliver delight, Keep it human, Every detail counts, Imagine it better, and Tackle it together) and are evaluated on them during reviews. But in reality, they carry zero weight. You can live and breathe those values and still be cut. You can make no effort to live by the MAKEIT values and still have a job.

2.0
Apr 27, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great perks such as the Friday lunches, cake and benefits similar to other Tech company's. The people were the biggest pro until the best started to resign or were forced to leave!

Cons

Don't be distracted by free cake and enticed by the snazzy looking job descriptions, as it's not as fun as it looks. Little to no ownership of being able to make your own decisions or changes. All new processes get implemented by senior management, without any discussions with the people who actually do the job, and if you vocalise your disagreement or voice your opinion you will be penalised and pushed out. Structural and major role changes were made without any involvement from employees it would affect, and the Senior management would prefer to stick their heads in the sand and ignore the unhappy teams, multiple resignations from one team, and messy uninspiring new roles rather then tackle it head on to see how to improve. If your looking for a long term career in Account Management then MOO isn't for you, as it's more of a Customer service role with a sales target attached, and let's not forget to mention; the lowest commission structure, unnecessary call targets and very slow progression plans that don't include a substantial pay rise attached.

Viewing 109 - 111 of 250 Reviews

Glassdoor has 264 MOO reviews submitted anonymously by MOO employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if MOO is right for you.