Machinify reviews

2.1

26% would recommend to a friend

(60 total reviews)

David Pierre

26% approve of CEO

26% positive business outlook

Machinify has an employee rating of 2.1 out of 5 stars, based on 60 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Machinify employee rating is 45% below average for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

60 reviews
1.0
Sep 21, 2025

A Limit on Hope

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

WFH Flexibility, excellent on-campus facilities, favorable PTO benefits.

Cons

Massive disconnect between the goals of executives and needs of analysts to manage day to day operations. Management has not once acknowledged or taken action to allow analysts to succeed. Current bonus structures have placed hard ceilings on how much an analyst will receive and place new analysts at an unfair disadvantage. Previously, there was no limit as to how much your bonus could be. Everything was based on the work completed that month. Case handling quality control is wildly inconsistent and you will often find yourself biting the bullet for someone else's errors. Team leads and assistant team leads are generally empathetic to the needs of analysts (I cannot speak for all leads, just the ones I have had) but are often limited in their ability to alleviate the situation due to company policy and/or their own workload. A full day's work will consistently be insufficient to meet company demands, but there is no monetary incentive for working extra hours.

1.0
Aug 6, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Highly efficient, communicative recruitment process. Creative and effective interview process. Industry standard benefits.

Cons

Company exhibits a pattern of inconsistent and deceptive leadership behavior. Leadership presents friendly facade, but actions lack transparency, accountability, and due process. While outwardly fostering a seemingly collaborative environment, leadership actions contradict company stated values. Pay is on the low side for title, experience, geographic location, and industry. Benefits are industry standard, but employee group healthcare is too expensive.

1.0
Apr 30, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work from home full time. Team leads care about their team. Team members have strong relationship and respect for one another. The work does not get boring.

Cons

We have regular meetings that the company has all time profits, but pay has been slashed for all analysts, some losing up to 40% of their annual income. If our profits are an all time high, why are there pay cuts? Yes, we have heard a million times that *salary* has not been cut. But we all know that bonus/commissions are the majority of analyst income, and they have been hugely reduced, and capped. The majority of management, directors and operations managers, struggle to communicate effectively. Changes are not presented to the floor in a uniform manner, and often changes are made last minute with little planning or thought put into them. Workload for analysts is at an all time high, incoming calls for ACD all day, as opposed to one hour a day, and increased file (work) distribution. Goals and metrics are at an all time high. Micromanaging and expectations are at an all time high. Pay for analysts is at an all time low. In addition, some operations managers have been bragging to non operations managers that they all got a pay raise - while everyone else had the opposite. Leadership staffing (team leads, assistant team leads, quality and training), have been slashed in half. Half of the leadership staff were demoted. Some of these people have been in that position for 5+ years. You can tell your team lead and assistant team lead genuinely want to help you, but with the cut in staffing it’s clear they don’t have room to help like they did before, without regularly putting in overtime. When concerns, or recommendations are offered to operations, directors, or even our subrogation president, analysts and leads are met with dismissive and often even hostile responses. It seems that there are no safeguards in place to ensure that the subrogation department is being managed equitably and in good faith. With the major increase in workload and cut to staff work force (not by layoffs, but demotions and increased standards with decreased pay that have resulted in roughly 25% of staff leaving on their own accord), quality and customer service have taken a huge hit, (previously the 2 factors that made legacy company Rawlings a champion in the subro market) and I foresee major client abrasion to come in the future.

avatar
Machinify Response
1y
Thank you for taking the time to share such a detailed and thoughtful review. It's clear that you care deeply about the quality of the work, the wellbeing of your peers, and the future of the subrogation department — and we don’t take that lightly. You’ve raised important concerns around compensation, staffing changes, workload, and communication — all of which reflect a challenging period of transition, especially for teams that have been part of the legacy business for many years. The post-merger environment has brought pressure to evolve quickly, and while that comes with necessary change, we recognize that some changes have created real stress and frustration for the Subrogation team. We also hear the call for better communication and clarity — not just about what’s changing, but why it’s changing. That’s an area where we know we need to improve, and we’re actively working on it. Your input will be shared with leadership as part of broader efforts to bring the Subrogation team’s employee experience to the level of satisfaction we maintain in the rest of the organization. Thanks again for your perspective and your commitment to the team.
Viewing 7 - 9 of 60 Reviews

Glassdoor has 61 Machinify reviews submitted anonymously by Machinify employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Machinify is right for you.