Mathematica reviews

3.1

46% would recommend to a friend

(97 total reviews)
avatar

Paul Decker

23% approve of CEO

17% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

97 reviews

Reviews about "Management"

Return to all reviews
3.0
Sep 27, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I learned how to be a better coder and got fluent in R. They teach very good, rigorous coding practices for "statistical programming" type work. Also learned about using Git which was helpful.

Cons

TOO REGIMENTED: You have to fill out 40 hours on a time sheet...even if you don't have enough work or have too much work. There's a lot of pressure to get to 40 some how. ISOLATED: You have your "supervisor" who staffs you on projects (but doesn't work with you otherwise). You might work 3-5 projects at a time. They all have their own deadlines etc. and you need to let them know what works and discuss with your supervisor on that. That said...if you DO push back...sometimes they just kinda say "no get it done on time" or whatever. HARD TO GET AHEAD: Very rigid/formal promotion structure. If you want to work on X type of work or learn Y skill, you can tell your supervisor...but no garuntee you end up on that project. It's also hard to know what type of work is out there. GRUNT WORK: Too much grunt work. I was given lots of "put field codes into this table" tasks...like for hundreds of cells across dozens of tables. ISOLATED WORK: Often times you're tossed on to a project to finish X task and then you leave. It's hard to make strong connections. Also, sometimes the task you're thrown on is useless grunt work. HOLIER THAN THOU ATTITUDE ABOUT BEING "WORKED OWNED": They love to talk about that but you can't actually vote on stuff like how many vacation days you should get. I wish we had a union.

2.0
Aug 29, 2024

Needs a culture/mindset change

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- good and intelligent coworkers - remote and flexible schedule

Cons

- poor compensation and pto. We get routine emails to donate PTO for colleagues that have emergencies (how about we make an exception for someone in an emergency?) - fear based motivation from management - management is old and only there because they've been at the company for a long time. Not aware of what's needed technologically to push the company forward - hush hush culture - very hierarchical structure - no professional development for junior analysts. I asked to get on a certain type of project for over 1 year. - billing model should be changed - super slow promotions overall: you can tell the company is run by people who have been there a long time. There's little focus on the benefits of new hires and every decision from management is to maximize their retirement package that's coming soon. Motivation should come from a place of excitement and not fear of losing hours or making a mistake.

2.0
Aug 24, 2024

Not what it should be

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Work life balance is generally pretty good, especially the flexible workplace policy. - I liked the PTO benefits and disagree with some of the other comments on here. It felt pretty generous and the company really respects time away. Though other benefits could be improved like healthcare premiums, tuition/student loan/professional development support, mental health, etc. - Lots of opportunity to create your own path and pursue work that you're interested in. The work was really challenging and fun at times, and some of clients are really great to work with. - Mission driven so the work has real positive impacts.

Cons

I noticed something strange going on at Mathematica of the last few years. Executive leadership really blundered on opportunities to be transparent and actually listen to the feedback of its employees (it is employee owned after all, but they seem to have forgotten that). I think the company is desperate for new leadership, in need of leaders that actually inspire and lead by example with empathy toward others. Echoing one of the comments below, after leadership dropped the ball on communications regarding new rules for our billable targets, there was a leak of some execs’ bonuses on their internal social media site. Their response was to fire the individuals involved, even those involved by accident—they then held an all staff meeting where the incident was completely ignored and they talked about “love” and “magic” as if that was supposed to fix things. Everyone else’s bonuses and salaries (those not in the c suite) are easily accessible in the company because of how we were staffed and budgeted, so what are they hiding? Maybe they’re embarrassed because they are so self focused and entitled. The CEO is pretty invisible so one might question how warranted his bonus/salary really is. But hey, they are all buddies and they make the rules, so as long as the stock price is going up (aka their retirement packages), who cares about the lack of investment in the rest of the employees. Many key people have been leaving left and right, many because of lack of promotions and professional development due to the backup of execs coasting into retirement. It also doesn’t really matter how much new work you can bring to the company or time you spend managing difficult clients or the time you spend on proposals, you’re just seen as unbillable. I left because I didn’t see a path forward and got a better offer elsewhere. Maybe I’ll come back some day but not with their current leadership.

Viewing 25 - 27 of 97 Reviews

Glassdoor has 601 Mathematica reviews submitted anonymously by Mathematica employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Mathematica is right for you.