Netcracker Technology reviews about "manager"

Concerning points 1. The current leadership does not have the ability to think in a futuristic way. There are only (only 2~3 max) people who could possibly think well ahead of time – what as a product line we should do, how we should solve (& monetize) our customer’s problem, how we could grow our own lieutenants by unleashing their true potential and enabling them in/with new technology platform. Nothing implicitly or explicitly expressed so far from those community. 2. Not so efficient director and senior managers – most of them are non-technical. Not a single attribute can be vouched for in them like: Technology and/or BSS /OSS Domain/Business analysis and/or, process, where they can truly contribute to delivery, or enable the team. They only know how to forward a thread by looping others (sometime that also found to be wrong). It’s unbelievable that how a product company with such tremendous legacy (enriched product line, RBM) could have afforded this? Or sometimes it appears to be deliberate to finish the enterprise? 3. The most unfortunate symptom that this organization is carrying even after 12 years of buying Convergys in 2012-13. This is with respect to “holding critical decision” by CIS/Russian community. It HAS been proven every time that decision making responsibility, ability to leading a higher position is not something ever be extended to Indian Community or to be more precise it will never be extended to those who were acquired from Convergys in 2012-13, regardless of their deep product knowledge, sharp technical prowess, uncompromising delivery contribution, effective client liaison (someone has to remember that without any CIS presence 100’s of implementations went from conceptualization – to – Cut-over at ease). It’s finally the TRUST factor and a sense of RESPECT that Indian community never got since the acquisition of Convergys by Netcracker or even for the others who were not part of old Convergys as well. 4. Fostering a very TOXIC ambiance by encouraging many un-professional actions (you name it and it exists fortunately): wrong promotions to few folks (while there were more deserving candidates) consistently, recruiting regularly in-efficient candidates (even knowingly they would be a complete miss-fit the fathom of complexity for which the recruitment is being done) and safe-guarding again them despite not able to lead a phase or project or both, deliberately keeping the experienced members sidelined & highlighting few stream of people who can always say “YES”, sticking always to some pathetic framework and not able to come out from that “emotion”, Overlooking the faults to fellow CIS despite several unbelieving miss from their leadership and then to finally reaching out to non-CIS person (who was never given free hand, authority, support) to help rescuing from the complex situation.

Employee perks were removed slowly and that includes basics like tea, coffee and office cab. Lack of projects and very poor management. Russians dominate the work environment and proper opportunity is not given, Employee performance reviews are not shared and discussed by the manager and they just blindly ask us to improve without telling us what was on the review, Reviews are given by Russians and no matter how well you do, you get an avg review. If you get a good russian manager then your career is safe there. They fire you without warning or reason. They pump and dump employees based on demand.

Poor management, stressful work environment, people's insecurity to speak up. I was also hired to support the general manager who never spoke to me. Toxic culture!

No pros to mention as such, as manager keeps on nagging to allocate projects or to give increments.

Little technical growth, bad managers who have a sense of hierarchy and use old fashioned manipulation and lying to retain employees No appraisal cycle/discussions One way feedback No role of HR, no periodic discussions by HR

Old monolith (not applied to new solution on microservices) is based on everything that is written inside the company, you will barely learn something that is required on the market. There is a product, which means that if you are not in a product team (most of the employees) you will not create new services, you will adjust, customize, extend. Dependency on a project, your experience will vary from project to project (pros as well).

Many cons: 1. They are removed all good benefits like free food , transport , apprisal 2. Worst managers and management 3. No KRA 4. Hire for Java and assigned UI work 5. Emergency also you cant apply WFH 6. Russian Ruled company 7. Worst HR and No activity no fun no free lunch no outing 8. No path defined for next level 9. HR has no words to say if you discuss anything

1.>Only few people who are just bootlicking there managers so called LM's are manage to sustain their job as skilled people don't stay because most of the people are lacking technical so that's only option. 2.>No hike , they will push you to work 12-13 hours and at the time of hike will say that they are in loss wow nice trick , there loss never recovered and it will never as they are running this ship with bootlickers i.e. lacking technical 3.>Very few projects they have after hiring they will ask you to give another interview ok not a problem but they are so stupid that they tag a backend dev in frontend project and ask them to appear interview really they are so confused. 4.>Clients don't trust them already lost two clients since i was there. 5.>Indian employees are on least priority they didn't gave hike since 3 years , they micromanage all work and all at the time of hike they just kick people out saying project work almost shrinked so resign else will fire. 6.>Few employees think this is their dad's company literally don't do anything just log unnecessary hours and do lot of zoom meeting and think they are champ.