Pacific Life reviews

3.4

61% would recommend to a friend

(684 total reviews)
avatar

Darryl Button

65% approve of CEO

61% positive business outlook

Pacific Life has an employee rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 684 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Pacific Life employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Insurance industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

684 reviews
2.0
Jan 16, 2018

Not for Millennials or the Ambitious

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Good location - Work life balance

Cons

- Everybody is a lifer. If you haven't been there 10+ years, you're nobody. - Company is out of touch and behind on industry - Hardly any opportunity for growth - CEO is awkward, doesn't have executive presence - Benefits are not competitive - Work is not challenging

avatar
Pacific Life Response
8y
Thank you for the feedback. We are committed to fostering a creative, challenging and empowering environment focused on career growth for our employees. I’m sorry to hear that we missed delivering on this experience during your time with Pacific Life. We value all feedback and are always looking for ways to improve the work environment. We know it can be challenging to move ahead in an organization that has many long service employees. We are proud that people who work for us want to stay with us. This says something about the positive culture we have created. We are working hard to provide more early career opportunities to our employees through a number of programs such as our Actuarial Rotation program and Sales Academy. We know more work is needed and this continues to be a focus for us. Additionally, we have several enterprise-wide initiatives underway that will build a more modern, flexible and responsive workplace for our employees. We are excited about these initiatives and are pushing forward to deliver on these in the near future. If you’d like to share your ideas on what we could do better, feel free to contact Employee Relations at 949-219-3532.
1.0
Dec 8, 2025

Misguided RTO mandate

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Salary levels and 401k match are relatively high, benefits are exceptional

Cons

Over the past few years, company culture has been on a steep decline. Executive leadership has reversed its flexible remote-work policy, previously two days per week in office (through rarely enforced) to a strict four days per week mandate. Many employees now commute primarily to attend Zoom meetings from their desks. There is a general sense that the company is indifferent to the well-being of staff, which represents a tidal wave shift from the previous experience, where policies such as Rejuventation Days (extra company wide holidays) made employees feel cared for and valued. Middle managers are overburdened with increased responsibilities amid reduced resources (due to inability to fill positions because of RTO policy and flight of institutional knowledge) and significantly reduced employee motivation. Leadership treats employees as interchangeable commodities and made the incorrect assumption that voluntary attrition from RTO would be minimal and could be easily replaced in any case. This calculation has proven incorrect: top talent - those with the most external options - have departed for more flexible roles elsewhere, leaving critical vacancies that are difficult or impossible to fill in a competitive market. Look at the number of open positions currently, which underscores the scale of this challenge. Turnover costs are substantial, extending far beyond simply headcount to include the permanent loss of institutional knowledge. The situation is poised to worsen once the four-day mandate is enforced for all employees (currently delayed for those without assigned desks due to insufficient office space). The prior remote model enabled access to the strongest national talent pool, while the new policy restricts hiring to only those willing to accept a rigorous in-office requirement. Prospective applicants should carefully contemplate joining Pacific Life given the direction of company culture and RTO mandate. Ongoing attrition is likely to accelerate as employees weigh lengthy commutes (often 1+ hours each way), local housing costs (median ~$3.5M in Newport Beach), and diminished job satisfaction. The company continues to benefit from momentum created by earlier remote-era hires, but this competitive advantage will erode and will soon become a liability. Leadership is unlikely to reverse course, as doing so would require acknowledging a policy error. Forcing physical presence - sitting in cubicles, enduring traffic, and watching the clock - is being conflated with "culture." True culture stems from hiring passionate individuals, fostering trust through meaningful collaboration, and aligning on shared intent, not mandating proximity.

avatar
Pacific Life Response
6mo
Thank you for sharing your perspective and for your contributions over the past several years. We recognize that changes to our return-to-office approach have raised concerns about flexibility and culture. Our goal remains to strengthen collaboration and connection across teams while supporting employees through this transition. We are committed to fostering a positive employee experience and continue to use feedback from surveys and conversations to guide improvements. Your insights are important to us—please feel free to reach out to your HR Business Partner so we can continue the conversation.
Viewing 16 - 18 of 684 Reviews

Glassdoor has 784 Pacific Life reviews submitted anonymously by Pacific Life employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Pacific Life is right for you.