employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory

Engaged Employer

SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory reviews

4.0

71% would recommend to a friend

(317 total reviews)

John Sarrao

71% approve of CEO

68% positive business outlook

SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 317 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Government & Public Administration industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

317 reviews
4.0
Jan 19, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Had the opportunity to work on some interesting projects - Very flexible work schedule

Cons

- long commute - food is ok

avatar
SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Response
3y
Thank you for taking the time to share your experiences at SLAC. We’re glad that you were able to contribute to some interesting projects as an intern. SLAC strives to provide our interns with valuable research and business experiences to allow them to develop their skills and grow professionally. We hope you will consider SLAC as an employer in the future.
5.0
Jan 17, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Friendly, approachable, collegial culture across the lab.

Cons

Expensive area to live in.

3.0
Jan 7, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are many opportunities for scientists to grow and develop their skills due to the vast capabilities and talented pool of technical and scientific professionals. However, it is important for scientists to be proactive and assertive in advocating for their goals, as some political maneuvering may be necessary. Instead of simply complaining, it is better to speak up and actively push for what you want. While there may be some risks involved, the potential rewards of pursuing your goals with determination far outweigh any potential drawbacks.

Cons

The lack of leadership training and experience among scientists can contribute to poor performance in senior leadership roles. While academic achievement is not necessarily indicative of leadership abilities, it is often used as a criterion for selecting directors and leaders. However, this can be problematic as research success often requires self-centered behavior, which is incompatible with effective leadership. It is not surprising that mistakes are made in the selection process due to the limited understanding of management and leadership within the scientific community. Low salaries for the Bay Area cost of Living Lots of corruption, like all over the United States of course. The decision-makers can hire whoever they want, they can promote whoever they like, they can give raises/bonuses to whoever they prefer, and pretty much they have enormous flexibility. As long as you (or your protector) make it to the decision-makers club, then you are set! There are numerous lazy and laid-back employees because there are no regular performance-based layoffs. This can be due in part to the low salary offered for these non-science roles, as there are not many candidates eager to leave their current positions for such positions.

Viewing 64 - 66 of 317 Reviews

Glassdoor has 404 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory reviews submitted anonymously by SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory is right for you.