Tripadvisor reviews

3.5

50% would recommend to a friend

(1,364 total reviews)
avatar

Matt Goldberg

23% approve of CEO

22% positive business outlook

Tripadvisor has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 1,364 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Tripadvisor employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

1K reviews
2.0
Jun 10, 2020

Overdue Leadership Change

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Colleagues, benefits, culture (prior to 2019)

Cons

The company is a hot mess right now for a variety of reasons; however, one of the biggest mistakes was hiring a key officer on the leadership team. This person is intelligent on the surface but has created a corrosive, toxic work environment. The culture of TripAdvisor that so many people loved is now a distant memory. Additionally, the B2C team is extremely disorganized, unproductive and unable to execute. The company did need innovation and a fresh perspective but this is not the type of leader that breeds success.

avatar
Tripadvisor Response
5y
Thanks for your feedback. This perspective, and your experience with Tripadvisor recently, is certainly disappointing to hear. As you know, the last 18 months have been a period of intense change at Tripadvisor, and we acknowledge there have been some growing pains as new leaders join and teams are reorganized. Management changes, new ideas and different styles of leadership are often difficult on employees, but sometimes change is imperative for an organization to grow, evolve and build a culture with innovation at its core. No manager is perfect, nor do they all follow the style of leading their teams, but every manager should be open to constructive feedback. As always, we encourage employees to share that feedback with their managers or (if that makes you uncomfortable) to work through their HR business partner. You can also reach out and share specific feedback directly with me. You might be surprised just how impactful that engagement can be in helping leaders grow as the company culture evolves. As we strive to create a positive work environment, with a focus on all that is good about our culture, your continued engagement is welcomed and necessary. Beth Grous Chief People Officer
1.0
Feb 1, 2016

Sinking (shiny) Ship

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Free lunch. Honestly, everyone lists the free lunch as one of the few things good about TripAdvisor. Consider how meaningless a "pro" this is.

Cons

TripAdvisor benefits from an advantage of having more content than it's competitors. Not only will this advantage not last forever, but the company risks having it's lunch eaten by another player using TripAdvisor's own API to display it's content in a more useful, relevant manner. The executives at TripAdvisor are more interested in muddling feature on top of feature, than they are in settting a reasonable and innovative strategy and improving their existing product. But culture eats strategy for breakfast, and the culture at TripAdvisor is breathtakingly saccharine, selfish, and void of anything approaching professional development or learning. "Speed wins" at TripAdvisor, which means any opportunity to learn, to grow, to succeed in something other than a wildly thrown together mess, loses. Speed wins so much that the code base is a mess, left to engineering to deal with (or run away from), and that sales can't even keep up with the new functionality. And that new functionality roadmap? Doesn't come from the users. TripAdvisor could not possibly be any less user-centered. Product Managers rule the roost here, and their idea of engaging user feedback is a/b testing, and only a/b testing. Meanwhile, customer service is fielding thousands of complaints, but are put in the impossible position of either not being familiar with the (often new and fleeting) functionality, or having to just file a bug with existing functionality that has little hope of ever getting fixed. The supposed quality control of the PMs is "Product Review," in which 30 people glued to their laptops, sit around a table, only to momentarily perk up 2 hours into the meeting when their spec is presented. But hey, FREE LUNCH!

avatar
Tripadvisor Response
10y
Wow, I'm surprised to have such an unhappy employee, and I would be happy to chat in person about this as well. Let me try to explain my thinking on the points you raise. Content licensing: We license our content (a few reviews or snippets) to help propel our brand. We don't license all of our reviews to anyone (that I can think of). So while the API is helpful to many companies, and we have hundreds (if not thousands) of license partners, we love the fact that they are helping us build our global brand. I acknowledge that there is a risk that we are enabling travelers to find our content without visiting TripAdvisor, but I'd argue it has worked stunningly well for the past 15 years. Hard to prove, but I don't know why our current API/program would change the successful dynamics of the past decade. "Speed Wins": Speed wins is an important cultural aspect to this company. It means that we value going fast, rather than long strategy planning sessions, bi-annual product roadmap sessions, and other hallmarks of big, slow companies. Speed wins does NOT mean we ship crap code, or ignore what users want in the name of 'going fast', or any of the myriad of ways that phrase can be misused or misunderstood. I subscribe to the 'done is better than perfect' mantra, which irks some, and worse, is sometimes used as an excuse to ship something that embarrasses us. We've made mistakes, of course, and I've publicly acknowledged that we have some technical debt to take care of... but we are making good progress. I'd love to hear your thoughts/suggestions on how I can better communicate these values to everyone in our company. I'm sure you aren't a fan of 'slow and perfect' as a motto, so better communication of "Speed Wins" is even more important at 3000 people than 30 people. Culture is important, and this is one of my most important challenges as we grow... how to instill/maintain a sense of 'what does the traveler want', and 'how can we always press ourselves to deliver what they want, faster, more efficiently, with high quality.' As you likely know, we are actively working on the “culture question” at the organizational level, making sure that we have clear, well-understood values and supporting professional development opportunities, as I also recognize its importance. Product Direction: Where does our product roadmap come from? It certainly does come from what our users want, but we also try to forecast what they will want in the future. We don't always get it right, but we try. We're happy to copy ideas from other sites, buy companies that have done something well and integrate it into our product, and invent new functionality. Quality control of the PM's: We have a weekly product review meeting, which is open to the company. I think that is great. It’s an open meeting, so anyone who wants to learn what we are planning on can attend. It is meant as a communication forum, where a product manager can present what they plan to build, and all potential interest stakeholders can ask questions, comment, or simply nod in approval. It is quite efficient in that goal. Please don't view it as "quality control", as that is not the purpose. The fact that this meeting is weekly is also something we are proud of... we do a lot each week. Lots of small projects, some large. My micromanaging ways: True enough, I have some micromanaging habits. Some I feel are justified, some I need to change as the company continues to grow. I care a lot about the people in the company, and how we run as an organization, so I like to be involved in many aspects of the business. I used to not only approve job openings across the company, I used to interview every single new hire (in the final round). I really want to hire the best. That didn't scale, and I stopped interviewing everyone. I do approve open requisitions, because I am interested in knowing where our headcount is growing, and how we are resourcing against our most important priorities. That said, I try hard not to be a bottleneck in the hiring process. I also care a lot about the product and the technology. I use our products daily, and express my opinions and file bugs. Why? Because I want to contribute in as many ways as I can to make our product better. Is that scalable? Nope. But I do it anyways because I care. Some interpret that as micromanaging, but I view it as a positive. Finally, I am a believer that the best companies are the ones that move fast and are the quickest to adapt. While our business is very healthy, we continue to 'reinvent ourselves' each year to be better for our travelers, better for our clients, and better for our employees. Steve
2.0
Jun 8, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- A great place to learn coding style conventions, scoping of large projects, and many other skills necessary for software engineering careers. - Free lunch. - Great place to network with engineers. Lots of startups in the area are founded by ex-TripAdvisor employees.

Cons

- Little opportunity for advancement, and company badly attempts to hide this by promising more opportunities 'if you work hard.' - Vague guidelines for how to properly utilize engineering rotation. - Extremely poor management of technical debt. - Outdated technological stack and senior management resistant to change. - Tolerance of management/groups that are uncommunicative and insular. - HR department is behind the times. - Very little standardization of technology between groups or even employees. Having employees configure their own dev boxes is a prime example that cost enormous amounts of productivity for minimal learning gains. - Code base is collapsing under its own weight. To their credit, they hired a senior engineer solely to mitigate this issue. When I left the company, morale was quite low. Not only are there very few senior roles available, it is not attractive to take a senior role because the technologies and design philosophy are falling behind industry standards, hobbling ability to jump to other companies or even to change position within the company.

Viewing 10 - 12 of 1,364 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,683 Tripadvisor reviews submitted anonymously by Tripadvisor employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Tripadvisor is right for you.