Workhuman reviews

Decision-making is highly top-down, with major organisational and team decisions often made without involving the managers or teams who have direct operational knowledge or understanding of day-to-day realities. This frequently leads to unnecessary disruption, shifting priorities and reduced trust within teams. There also appears to be a lack of mature leadership capability at senior levels. Some directors seem insufficiently experienced for the complexity of the organisation, while strategic direction is heavily centralised around the CEO. Senior leaders tend to align with decisions rather than constructively challenge them, which can limit healthy debate and balanced decision-making. Engineering teams are generally well compensated, but workloads can be excessive and sustained pressure appears to be normalised. Burnout and stress-related absence are common, and while wellbeing is discussed, the operational culture does not consistently support sustainable working practices in reality. The company may suit people who thrive in fast-moving, high-pressure environments and are primarily motivated by compensation and benefits. However, for those seeking psychologically safe leadership, operational maturity, collaborative decision-making and sustainable pace, it may not be the best long-term fit.

The management is definitely the worst I've ever seen. Everyone is looking out for themselves and will happily throw you under the bus to save their skin. This probably is influenced by which department you're in but my experience was awful. I would strongly recommend no one work there unless they want to be constantly gaslit and undermined by the most incompetent people you're ever likely to meet. Used to be a nice place with nice people but I slowly watched the culture become a lot more toxic and I imagine that it's only gotten worse.