eHealth reviews

This place runs on leadership optics, not competence. During my time there, the company cycled through three CEOs, each shift creating more instability and zero long-term direction. Many leaders seem focused on one goal: looking good for the executive team. Reality is filtered, problems are buried, and metrics are polished before they go upstairs. People get promoted who can’t perform the same job agents handle daily. Proven performers are overlooked while visibility, agreement, and politics win. That disconnect destroys trust and credibility fast. SMU is a complete disaster — bloated with “coaches” whose primary role is box-checking and script enforcement rather than actual development. Real coaching is rare; bureaucracy is everywhere. Speak up about problems, favoritism, or inefficiencies and you’ll quickly be labeled “not a culture fit.” The non-retaliation messaging exists in training slides, not in reality. The company has faced federal scrutiny in the Medicare space, adding reputational risk and uncertainty to an already unstable environment. Talent continues to leave. Institutional knowledge walks out the door. Morale sinks lower every year.

Only con is it was a seasonal position, permanent placement is not guaranteed.