College Board reviews

3.6

56% would recommend to a friend

(662 total reviews)
avatar

David Coleman

66% approve of CEO

66% positive business outlook

College Board has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 662 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The College Board employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Education industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

662 reviews
2.0
Jan 24, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Driven by an enduring mission to ensure more kids across America succeed in high school and matriculate to college, College Board fosters close-knit teams. Middle-management — Executive Directors, Vice Presidents — is generally supportive of personal and professional goals.

Cons

College Board leadership seems to have a poor understanding of the labor market, specifically the detestable “market rates” for salary. While a not-for-profit, the organization apparently limits itself to similarly large non-profits to determine compensation, even though talent is leaving for very different types of firms and organizations. Leadership should reconsider, that is broaden, its basket of comparable organizations to retain talent in the current market. Additionally, the idea that successful, high-performing individuals must “wait their turn” for promotion is frustrating and severely diminishes the talent experience. Though direct-managers' hands are often tied by anachronistic HR practices, like a queueing system within teams for promotions — i.e., regardless of growth or impact one cannot advance ahead of others on their team who have “waited their turn." This runs orthogonal to stated goals about advancement. Advancement should be predicated on impact, not tenure of service. This fact played a substantial role in me leaving the organization, in addition to the depressed pay for the value I brought (including in-demand technical skills).

avatar
College Board Response
2y
Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback on working at College Board. The mission orientation of the people on our teams unites us and drives us to continue growing in how we serve students. We are sorry to hear that we did not meet your career advancement expectations. We offer a competitive total rewards program (salary, incentives, and benefits) that seeks to retain and attract top talent, compete with the external market, and ensure fair and consistent pay practices. We are proud of our data-driven approach to both compensation and promotions and are doing more to share the opportunities with our employees.
2.0
Sep 11, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great benefits and great name recognition

Cons

Many Black and brown employees spoke out for years about unequal treatment; little has been done in response Black and brown employees aren't promoted fairly, particularly Black women; most are in administrative and support roles Leadership doesn't reflect the students they claim to serve Leadership is a part of the Yale/Ivy League club, so there isn't much "diversity of thought"

2.0
Jul 25, 2016

IT - Lack of Meaningful Leadership

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

This mission is meaningful, if we could get out of our own way. The benefits are top notch and a differentiator, but on the decline. There are pockets in the IT organization that are finding ways to innovate, despite roadblocks from the highest leaders. I enjoy my day-to-day work, work on a great team with a great immediate manager, and have found ways to continue to innovate. Depending upon who you work for, you might be able to as well.

Cons

The average IT delivery resource is hard-working and trying to deliver well under challenging circumstances. IT senior leadership philosophies are generally old and outdated, focusing on a command and control structure and management concepts from the 1980’s and 90's. Middle management is stuck between trying to do the right thing for staff while keeping at bay the CIO's sycophants and spies (cronyism is rampant). The CIO is out of touch (staying in her office the large portion of the day), condescending to most employees except those in her inner circle, focused on the success of herself above others or even her department, and devoid of modern technical or leadership depth. The culture of fear is pervasive (especially in her direct reports), and the environment includes a toxic balance of high wire political acrobatics with just the right amount of cya. Senior management beyond Reston seems oblivious. IT reorganized into a "capability model" in one of the worst reorganization efforts I have ever witnessed. It happened overnight, with no guidance on how to operate moving forward, and resulted in rampant confusion about who was responsible for what. It is easily fixable, but it was a completely avoidable disaster and took a toll on an already depleted staff. Even the most technologically passionate express frustration. And leadership wonders why engagement numbers are low. Overall College Board senior leadership evaluates engagement via annual surveys, the low results of which are explained away year over year with minimal movement. The ensuing engagement improvement efforts are lackluster superficial attempts leading to no real material changes. Many employees recently threw up their hands and stopped filling out the surveys. More and more key resources keep walking out the door, taking institutional knowledge with them (ranging from recent hires to seasoned veterans). The career pathing is rudimentary, and College Board has given up on establishing meaningful upward trajectory.

Viewing 10 - 12 of 662 Reviews

Glassdoor has 832 College Board reviews submitted anonymously by College Board employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if College Board is right for you.