Content Guru reviews

3.3

52% would recommend to a friend

(177 total reviews)
avatar

Sean Taylor

58% approve of CEO

43% positive business outlook

Content Guru has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 177 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Content Guru employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

177 reviews
1.0
Mar 20, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- The salary. For a role straight out of university, the starting salary is strong. However, I have to agree with a previous review: the salary is more compensation (and, pretty much, a bribe) rather than a reward for the work you do. - The security guy is a good laugh. - The slightly ridiculous Redwood-branded sweets you’ll find in meeting rooms are actually pretty good. - There’s a pool table. - Wetherspoons is just up the road.

Cons

- Summary: Content Guru is fundamentally broken, totally lacking in structures and organisation necessary to be the company it currently claims to be. The rhetoric and culture running through the company is toxic, and senior management are so disconnected that a group personality disorder seems almost feasible. - Lies. As you're being recruited, you'll be told a number of lies (or at least, non-truths) about Content Guru. The first is that they like to develop you. The second is that they will train you. They will do neither. As far as I can tell this is pretty much true across the board, but I can say for sure from my own experience that this is emphatically true in Sales. If anything, you'll be the opposite of developed. You'll be encouraged to behave in an underhand manner, and I've regularly seen colleagues straight up lie to clients. The training, however, is the major bugbear. Working in this industry requires a good deal of technical knowledge about telecoms. Which department you're in will affect how much, but aside from Finance and Admin, you'll need a very strong base level. That's fair enough in and of itself, but you're given no help reaching it. This is despite the inescapable fact that they need you to have it, in order to do your job properly. Training consists of some fairly tedious (but obligatory, to be fair) security, health and safety sessions. There's also an induction presentation, meant to be given on your first day. I got five minutes into mine before being abandoned, and it was never completed. Hardly professional. The only decent bit of training is the 'Basic Telephony' session, which briefly tells you a little about how the most basic aspects of the technology work. It's not nearly enough to help you sell anything with any confidence or integrity. Because of this, 99% of your training will be self-medicated, or the result of harassing someone technical to spare some of their extremely limited time. Despite regularly telling senior management that I didn't have enough information to properly do my job, I was never given any help in attaining it. You are told (and told to tell others, especially clients) that you're on a graduate scheme. You are not. Graduate schemes have a structure to them. The word 'scheme' implies that some thought has gone into the process undertaken, which cannot be the case here. I realised on my second day at the company that the training wasn't going to be adequate. Foolishly, I chose to persevere. - Culture. At first I felt I'd been hoodwinked into some elaborate wind-up, hosted by (and starring) corporate hell's own version of Ant and Dec. At Content Guru it is very quickly and very clearly made clear to you that passing your six month probation period is no mean feat, not least because you’re regularly witnessing colleagues either stressing over theirs, or ‘not passing’. You constantly fear for your job, and with good reason. I use scare quotes above because ‘not passing’ implies that you’ve done something wrong, or in some way failed to attain some targets set to you. In my case, at least, neither of these things were the case. I received no warnings that I was in danger of ‘not passing’ my probation, other than seeing colleagues dismissed with insufficient explanation. I was also set no targets, so had nothing to fall short of. I presume there was a vague ‘desired standard’, but apparently you call fall short of that, in two of my former colleagues’ cases, for offences like having a beard or an ‘accent’. Indeed, in my exit interview, I was told that I’d done nothing wrong, and that the person conducting the interview had every faith that I would have reached the desired level soon enough, provided more time. In fact, the exit interview was more of an apology than anything else, and I’d like to thank the manager concerned for being the only vaguely human person amongst my seniors during my time there. Other aspects of the culture are just as bad. Once you get to the Content Guru level of the office building, go through the doors and turn right, you enter an almost farcical environment saturated in the worst consequences of working in a male-dominated environment. Prior to working at Content Guru, though I spotted a gender gulf (something my presence only exacerbated), I assumed the modern day working environment would have grown out of something I considered outdated. Not to be. Things like due praise, being basically decent to people and humility all seem to be considered weaknesses, with the equivalent opposite qualities all being gratuitously displayed on a regular and tedious basis. Basic politeness was in short supply, too. Asking the Project Management team for anything, no matter how obviously it falls under their remit, was like drawing blood from an exceptionally dull stone. I’ve chosen not to go into detail on some of the comments/’jokes’ I’ve overheard from those at the very top of the tree, but suffice to say they are, at the very least, incredibly outdated and smack of a total lack of basic awareness. Then there’s the hours. From what I’ve heard, the hours in Engineering are pretty savage. However, I can only comment with authority on the hours in Sales. You are, quite obviously, expected to go beyond your contracted 9-5.30 hours. Indeed, we were told (in January, I believe) that we were expected to be in for 8.30 going forward, in order to ‘set an example’. Going home before half six also seemed to be treated with disdain. Confront senior management with that complaint and they’ll most likely respond with something along the lines of ‘this isn’t the case, no-one is penalised for going home on time’. I can’t verify the truth or falsity of that, given that I was dismissed with no feedback on what I’d done wrong, or hadn’t done right. What I can verify is that senior management are (or would be incredibly remiss not to be) acutely aware of this perception, and have done nothing to allay the worries of their employees. They simply remain silent and passive, and the fear culture perpetuates itself. If this is genuinely something those at the top wished to change, it’d be a three email, tops, to correct. The fact that that hasn’t, to my knowledge, happened, is tacit compliance with that perception. If you work here, do not expect to leave by six. Personally, I don’t know how those in the office with kids were able to justify it to themselves. - Lack of care. You are hired by Content Guru off the back of a strong degree from a Russell Group university, and having gone through a very thorough interview process. You will be hired because you’ve been deemed intelligent enough to grasp the difficult tasks in front of you, and succeed in those tasks. What’s expected of you, however, is ridiculous. A colleague told me that during his pay review, he was told something along the lines of ‘you need to care about the company’. This notion is utterly absurd, given how the company treats the majority of its employees. You are not cared for, or valued as an employee, at all. And yet, you are expected to, as mentioned in another review, adhere to an almost cult-like mentality about the company, which you’re constantly told is brilliant. During a Sales meeting, the MD voiced a complaint about this very website. He was frustrated that he was seen as being uncaring about those who worked for him, and explained to us that this wasn’t the case. At the time, I sympathised somewhat. It’s easy to be seen as the villain of the piece when you sit at the biggest desk. I no longer hold that view, for a number of reasons. First, the manner in which new graduate starters are treated is nothing short of abhorrent, and recruiting should simply be halted until it can be rectified. Second, is the obvious cowardice displayed whenever someone is let go. I consider it to be no coincidence that all three sackings I witnessed, including my own, took place whilst both possible decision makers were out of the office. As such, I received no meaningful explanation for my sudden unemployment. I was let go after four months, with no training in a highly technical industry, in my first job outside of university. Whoever decided that was ample evidence that I wasn’t sufficient didn’t have the confidence in their reasons to explain why their decision to hire me in the first place was now erroneous. If you are considering employment with, or a job offer from Content Guru – I mention this as these are the people you will be working for, and these are the standards they hold themselves to. In fact, the standards are a little lower. I was fired a week after learning of a sudden, close death, on the morning I returned from the funeral. I would advise the MD to reconsider his understanding of the word ‘care’.

1.0
Mar 10, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Frankly, there are very few positive aspects of working at Content Guru. Aside from the starting salary (which is particularly good for a new graduate) and the lavish Christmas Party, the only other positive aspect of the role, quite honestly, was my immediate team. (I guess free tea and coffee qualify as positives, but I wouldn’t go so far as to say that this is particularly worthy of praise.) Everybody in my team was genuine, intelligent and made the office incredibly fun. As a team, we all got along extremely well, both inside and outside of the office, and developed a bond that, thankfully, has continued outside of my time at the company. However, as my time at Content Guru was coming to a close, the weight of micromanagement, unrealistic deadlines and conflicting internal interests were slowly beginning to erode this atmosphere. More and more, the days of laughing and joking as a team whilst getting work done were replaced by days of arriving at work and silently, diligently completing items on your task list. The light-hearted, relaxed atmosphere that made the working day bearable was now being replaced by one of oppression- the same oppressive fear of retribution and blame that pervades the company. In light of this, the good starting salary should be considered as part salary, part compensation for the detrimental effects to your sense of self-worth and contentment.

Cons

Where to start? Do not believe any of the things you are told prior to working at Content Guru, aside from the constant reassurance that the company requires hard work. During the recruitment process, I was told the following things by JamITC, the recruitment company, none of which turned out to be even remotely true: 1. That the job was a graduate scheme – The job, by no stretch of the imagination, is a graduate scheme. There are not clear, designated paths of progression nor any interest in your development as an individual. The rigorous recruiting process does not serve to ensure that the best graduates are fast-tracked in their careers, but to ensure that the company ensnares those that it feels bestow prestige upon the company. The starting salary is the honey in the trap, sweetening the deal and trapping naive graduates. 2. That I would receive training (In evidence, the following quote is taken from a reply from the Director to a previous negative review: “All new graduates run through a training programme, have a personal mentor and have monthly progress reviews”) Of all of the things I was told during the recruitment process, this one is by far the most laughable. During my time at the company, I received no formal training whatsoever, aside from a few orientation presentations. I had no personal mentor and one brief review. The little training I did receive was given to me by members of my team, none of whom had received any formal training either, and which amounted to just enough to get the job done. This is not the fault of those in my team, but a flaw in the infrastructure and organisation of the company. Tasks and projects are designated on such an immediate basis that it goes beyond being a result of the fast-paced nature of the industry and points towards insufficient forward thinking and incompetent management. As a result of the constant hectic and unorganised nature of the working environment, there is not a spare moment for any staff to train new members. However, despite providing no training, structure, time or facilities to do so, the company is not afraid to demand that you immediately improve as an employee or face dismissal. 3. That I would, in my first six months, go on two international training courses- Of course, as it involves training, this did not turn out to be true. And, as far as I could tell, such a thing had never existed. This wasn’t just an exaggeration of the truth, as recruiters are prone to do, but a completely malign promise that had been designed, again, to lure unsuspecting graduates to their eventual demise. As for working at the company, I wouldn’t recommend it. The company is broken beyond repair, and the rot stems from the very top. From the start of your very first day, the threat of failing probation is held over your head as a constant, ever present threat designed to spur each employee to work to ridiculous deadlines until ridiculous hours. Those at Content Guru do not work past their contractual hours because they want to work extra or because they love their jobs, but because there is the commonly held belief that failing to work extra hours every single day, even where there is no need to, leads to dismissal. This unspoken policy of constant overtime, after signing a contract in which you waver your rights under the Working Time Directive, applies most to new graduates, who are all but told that failing to be seen staying late, no matter how good your work, will result in failing probation. Although in another reply from the Director, you are told that only “20-30%” of new employees do not make it through the probation period, during my time at the company, I know of 3 employees being dismissed during their probation and 2 passing it. The reasons given to all of those dismissed were a direct result of the unacceptable lack of training provided and the pervasive ‘if your face fits’ culture. This ‘if your face fits’ culture, however unconscious, means that the workforce is dominated by men, with women only beginning to make significant progress outside of the administrative office. In evidence, I witnessed, during my time there, derogatory comments regarding female employees by extremely senior members of the company, whilst other colleagues confirmed that they heard things of a similar nature. Progressive this company is not. The company prides itself on the quality of its employees and on hiring the ‘best and brightest’ young graduates from Russell Group universities. But it does not do so in order to build a strong workforce for the future nor to train and build these professionals at the beginning of their careers. It does not equip them with the necessary skills to grow and learn, but throws them in, with no training or concern for their development, in the naive and short-sighted belief that their innate intelligence will let them work out the ropes. If they do not learn these very specific and often nonsensical set of ropes quick enough, they are dismissed quickly and without mercy. At best, this is could be attributed to managerial negligence, at worst it is a deliberate strategy to lure naive graduates and trap them with false promises and an impressive salary in order to mould and indoctrinate them with scare tactics and threats of dismissal. Those that resist the indoctrination find themselves strewn aside. ‘There will be no loyalty, except loyalty towards the Company. There will be no love, except the love of Content Guru’ This company does not value its employees. The manner in which the company conducts its business completely undermines all of the ‘we value our employees’ posturing found in the replies by the director on this site. Aside from the pressure to work all hours God sends and surrender all rights to a social life from Monday-Friday, which is all but company policy, how can a company that so wantonly hires and fires employees and gives very, very little positive feedback say that it values its employees? The grand gestures of reward- the Christmas party, the “monthly” events and the on-site amenities- are no substitute for day-to-day support, encouragement and general common decency. If you are a person who likes to receive positive feedback of any kind, then this is not the company for you. It almost tradition for the first piece of work you complete to be eviscerated by the management and for you to receive a sarcastic, blunt email back stating that it is not good enough. Bear in mind, this is after no training, no induction and no guidance and for your very first piece of work as a professional. Yes, the standards are high and employees are expected to consistently produce their best work, but surely there is a better approach to achieving this than completing demoralising a new employee? Right from the very beginning of your employment, you are made to feel inferior, unimportant and, I cannot and have not stressed this enough, that your employment is under question. Working under the threat of wavering job security is not a healthy or sustainable approach to getting the most out of a work force that is full of potential and leads to countless Glassdoor reviews, like this one, that strongly advise that new graduates to never consider working for Content Guru. Taking the time to invest in your employees, as professionals and as human beings, rather than as expendable nuisances, would not only result in happier, more contended employees that choose to invest their time and best efforts in the company, but also create a cohesive, exciting work culture that makes each of the employees excited to pull together and work as a team. Instead, the existing culture promotes unhealthy amounts of internal politics, a complete lack of internal cohesion or loyalty, and a pressure to conform to the company’s dogmatic and archaic principles. Another benefit of hiring new, young graduates is that, for a company that strives to be on the cutting edge, you bring in young professionals full of ideas, enthusiasm and drive to succeed. These intelligent individuals have ideas that can push the company in new directions, giving it a competitive edge and leading to exciting new opportunities. If Content Guru encouraged its employees to suggest and try new ideas, allowed them the time and support to explore and develop them beyond an initial trial, then the criminal lack of training and support could almost be forgiven. Instead, the company forces employees to work under old fashioned business strategies whilst expecting market-leading results. New ideas and approaches are given one opportunity to succeed and if they do not produce impressive results instantly, then they are scrapped and the team is told to revert to “tried and tested” methods that are woefully out of touch with the current market. It is laughable that it fails to see the irony of being a cutting edge technology company that employs business, sales and marketing strategies from the early 90s and wonders why its competitors have the commercial edge. The company is fractured and broken. Each team is full of only the highest calibre members of staff and yet, the management does not allow anything to be done without omniscient control and interference. Quite simply, the management either do not have the confidence and faith in their staff to trust them to complete even the most basic of tasks without sign off from the very top, or they are too scared to let go of the reigns. Whilst reluctance to let go of a company that you built is understandable, it is not good business sense to attempt to maintain control over every minute detail of every piece of work, especially if there is a constant difference of opinion from the top. If it continues to operate as it does, Content Guru is bound to implode as a direct result of the stubborn, myopic megalomania of the management, particularly the Director. 1,700 words in, and still I feel as if I have only scratched the surface of the problems with this company. However, I shall finish by saying this, before working at the company I looked at all of these reviews and I chose to ignore them, believing that they were the words of a disgruntled few. Naivety, optimism and ambition blinkered my good sense and I took the job. Three weeks in, I realised my mistake. During my time there, I saw people fired and told to clear their desks within the hour for no reason, I saw people driven to insomnia by stress, I saw individuals work extremely hard and receive no praise or thanks at all, I saw people demoted from positions with no warning and no reason, I saw vulgar displays of favouritism and employees slowly learning to adopt the cult-like adoration for the company in order to get ahead. I saw the managers tear apart pieces of work for no good reason, send unprofessional responses and demonstrate a palpable apathy towards its employees. Worst of all, the company has fostered and encourages a very nasty blame culture that compliments the oppressive fear of being dismissed, sacked or demoted. Rather than examine a failure or problem as a result of bigger issues, the company looks for a scapegoat on all issues and watches them hang, believing an individual to be the root cause of all of its problems. An individual, without doubt, is the cause, but it is not the one that is now without a job, it is the one at the helm of a company that is full to the brim of employees worked to the bone and at the end of their tether.

3.0
Dec 15, 2014

Pros and cons

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Colleagues are great! Some of the nicest most genuine people I have met. All very hardworking, and have their heads screwed on - Office is brand new - Opportunities to travel from time to time - I can't speak for all managers, but my personal manager was a legend. He comes off as a tad intimidating initially. However he's also one of the most intelligent and caring managers I could have asked for. - Company is growing fast, as are the salaries - The company holds events and socials every few months - Depending on your role, there can be a lot of variety to your day - keeps you on your toes - You will learn a lot - most of it company specific however are a lot of products/custom services hence resulting in an astronomical amount to understand and take in - The Director of the company comes across as a reasonable man. I've had a couple of situations where I've just had a quick chat with him and he's put things straight. - If you are a specific kind of graduate it can be a decent company to start your graduate career

Cons

- The hours are long. Be prepared to give up your social life on weekdays and the odd weekend too. This is stressed at your interview and they aren't joking. The telecoms industry is a demanding place. The deadline for everything is yesterday. You will be stressed and you will struggle to 'switch off'. - There is an unfortunate 'blame' culture. It's a shame because it creates a rift and disheartens a lot of employees. They look for someone to blame for a fault as opposed to having faith in that persons ability and looking for the reason why they did, what they did. - Project management needs a change in culture - There is a superiority complex I believe that needs to be addressed. They need to understand their role is to manage the project/client. Not the engineers. This needs to be done by the engineering managers. - Promotions and career progression are not transparent enough. Employees should be given a clearer path with set goals. E.g. Engineer A wants to move into Development Engineering. In this case he/she should be set formal quantifiable targets. This would mean that they have something to strive for! At the moment it's all decided by higher powers behind closed doors. - Colleagues are great, most of them are very intelligent. However we need to hire more technical people. Maths degrees/Physics degrees show that a person is logical and has the ability to learn, but it seems rather pointless. If we hired more graduates who have more related experience. Peoples progression would be much faster in my opinion, and less mistakes would occur. - The project lifecycle needs to be more transparent. Engineers(application and platform) both need to be aware of what is going on at the start of a project with a formal brief. Often I've been in a situation where I've been given a task, performed it and had it not fit in with the rest of the scope of the project. We need to get into the habit of following a formal SDLC, utilizing agile techniques - something we're not doing at all.

Viewing 166 - 168 of 177 Reviews

Glassdoor has 195 Content Guru reviews submitted anonymously by Content Guru employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Content Guru is right for you.