employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Cranial Technologies

Engaged Employer

Cranial Technologies reviews

3.5

60% would recommend to a friend

(225 total reviews)
avatar

Debbie James

69% approve of CEO

58% positive business outlook

Cranial Technologies has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 225 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Cranial Technologies employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Manufacturing industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

225 reviews
2.0
Mar 19, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Salaried position and 8-5 (usually depending on the clinic). Everyone not in management (IS, clinicians, front desk) is wonderful to work with on a day-to-day basis! You get to work with cute babies babies Fairly thorough training The band really does work well!

Cons

- Money driven. I went through the change from the CEO Jeanne Pomatto-Hertz to the investment group. Not only were bonus programs and no raises given, patient centered treatment declined and management would come down on Clinicians for not recommending treatment if the clinician thought it unnecessary treatment (more recommendations = more money). They did not trust the judgment of their clinicians who had experience, unless they were managing clinicians (of which some had the same amount of experience as some of the "regular clinicians"). - Spent several years at this company and they have a "no reference" policy. So if you are looking to make lasting, work relationships, give this company a second thought. HR refused to make any comment to a new company whether I worked there or not. - Management is rough. Do not expect much from them. They are not very understanding and rely on their numbers. They contradict themselves consistently. There is no real way for management to improve upon themselves as HR does not pay attention to the company reviews unless someone literally cries, so you won't see much change. - It is true as you've read in the reviews, management is a clique. They'll all stick together. - It started as a fulfilling job (the orthotic is great if used properly), but gets worse and worse the longer you're there. The clinicians get pigeon holed and you do the same thing day after day. When management is not ever on your side, it's hard to be completely happy. - I've seen multiple people cry as well as quit.

2.0
Oct 4, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good pay and hours. Seemed like would have a great place to work if not for the cons below.

Cons

First, in writing any review, I take responsibility for MY shortcomings in a new job (as we all have these) and make an effort to focus as fairly as possible on the overall experience. It is not my intent to just vent or whine that something is "not fair". Life's not fair. Bummer. We all get that. That said, I have a stable work history, a good work ethic, and generally get along with most people and do well at work. I started here excited to be doing something new, planning to be there a long time. They have a thorough interview process, and even have you bring an art portfolio to your interview to assess your ability. Thought I had found a great opportunity. Cut to point: I lasted just over four of the expected 6-8 weeks training, and was fired with no warning or clear reason (see end) about 4 days after my 30-day review just the previous week (no negative concerns brought up at review). All seemed fine. Although the following "complaint" is usually looked upon as suspect/not credible when written by another woman, it WAS a real and observable issue, so I'm noting it here: It was rather obvious few days in that the woman training me (only woman in a dept. of men), didn't like/want to hire or train other women, and seemed to want to remain the only woman/trainer in the room. This was evidenced by her own comments during an only-half-joking conversation amongst employees that basically (not quite verbatim), "women don't work out [in this department?]", and that (for hiring purposes), there should be/she would like to have "yeah, no more women". It was obvious that she was not thrilled to have me there, and while she was reasonably polite and knowledgeable in training me, there was always a veiled, yet detectible undercurrent of irritation and/or condescension. She ignored me outside the work room (and sometimes IN it) as if I was not there. I am a reasonably accurate assessor of body language and general personality, and she wasn't a "warm fuzzy" person. I certainly understand that not all personalities mesh, and of course don't expect everyone to be my "buddy". Nevertheless, I decided to make the best of it, and learn as much and as quickly as I could, being polite and deferential to her authority while training (BTW, I got along fine with everyone else in the department, and tried observe the "culture", and go with the flow as most people would). In fairness, I had struggled with one aspect of the production process, but had already been shown the full process, been signed off to help with one step on "real" work, and had what I felt was a decent grasp, though I was still in training, and had not yet ironed the kinks and become technically "perfect", as expected. I thought I was showing my desire to succeed by making a point of asking others for tips that could help me learn (see other reviews), had been told several times by at least 3 other people that I was doing reasonably well at certain skills, and that "I think she is being a bit hard on you" by more than one. I took it in stride, and kept plugging away. It was a shock when I was called in (again, only a few days after an acceptable 30-day review, and before even finishing training) and simply told, "we're looking for the best fit, and have decided to move on", and that "It happens a lot [people not succeeding in finishing training and being let go]". (Why would this be?). I was out the door within ten minutes. It was sudden and unexpected, and I stumbled a bit and failed to ask for much further explanation. Should have asked for a clearer reason, but after consideration, and based on the above, coupled with other conversations and observations, there was more to the situation. Of course, I will now never know. Frustrating.

1.0
Oct 3, 2013

Very Unprofessional

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I cannot think of a single thing, the premise and presentation sounds good but once you get in there it is not. Wish I listened to the reviews and not wasted my time with this company

Cons

Clique Ran Obvious agenda of trainer to move you out Cold Training was ridiculous Management shares personal information with entire staff

Viewing 220 - 222 of 225 Reviews

Glassdoor has 228 Cranial Technologies reviews submitted anonymously by Cranial Technologies employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Cranial Technologies is right for you.