employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Snap Technology

Is this your company?

Snap Technology reviews

2.7

41% would recommend to a friend

(23 total reviews)

Karl Bickmore

52% approve of CEO

38% positive business outlook

Snap Technology has an employee rating of 2.7 out of 5 stars, based on 23 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Snap Technology employee rating is 30% below average for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

23 reviews
1.0
Jun 29, 2018

Great at Interviews, poor at employee care, loooong hours

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

paid certifications, 401k matched and good PTO, process driven

Cons

The executive staff cares little about their employees, the CEO has announced plans openly in meetings and in the press about his plans to grow to a size where he can sell the company off. Processes are in place that work, unless you are an executive, then you don't need to follow any of them. Pay is far under what other techs in the country are making. Numbers are everything and nothing, once a goal is achieved there is a fault in the way it was collected and a new goal is set cutting into your time, be ready to work lots of overtime without overtime pay. Zero protection for abusive customers. No job security, when things get tough they just cut staff to make up the difference so there's a lot of turnover in staff. No moving expenses for employees who relocate.

avatar
Snap Technology Response
6y
Thank you for your review. There definitely are times that the hours can be long, although this is not the norm. We do find that some individuals will choose to work more than is asked and we watch for that as we know that individual will overdue it and become inefficient. We never require long hours. Its really all driven from making sure our customer's needs are taken care of. Sometimes that does mean working in off hours. We also encourage our team to help each other so nobody carries the burden more than another. We work to have each others back when that happens. Fortunately, it is not constant and we do make sure the employees time is respected and given back as well. As far as open acknowledgement that some day in the future we may sell the business.... this is true. As a company we have a transparent management philosophy. We share out revenue numbers, sales goals and the company's "big hair audacious goal" or BHAG will our entire team. Our philosophy is that we should all know the goals and work together to achieve them. As I always say in meetings or in press interviews, it is not a settled fact that we will sell the business, but at some point the owners will want to retire and pass along the business to the right individuals. Our current mode is to acquire other businesses not to sell ours. It will be that way for several years forward.
5.0
Nov 7, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-GREAT Pay -Amazing Environment -Empathetic Management -Respect employees personal life -Fulfilling work duties and the chance to build rapport with friendly clients -Plenty of PTO and Sick days -Upper management is extremely chill -Micromanagement is non-existent -Powerful software to help manage clients -Room for mistakes and understanding of humanistic faults -Loyal to employees, and will have your back if customers step over the line -Learning atmosphere with an emphasis on helping teammates -Owners are experienced, and care about employees' personal lives -Standing desks -Tailor to employee comfort(desk height, custom keyboard, trackball, etc) -Culture breeds ideas and appreciates them -Pay for Certifications and promote growth internally -Job security due to reputable product differentiation -The amount of learning is astounding, and people are willing to teach you *** I have worked in organizations where the ideology is best described by the phrase "knowledge is power." Where coworkers aren't willing to share information due to fear of Job positions and entitlement. THIS IS THE EXACT OPPOSITE.*** -Although I had to take opportunity elsewhere, I cannot express how amazing this organization is. I learned more here than all other past jobs combined.

Cons

-Inability to keep workforce contingencies/ workload gets heavy if staff leaves. -Clients can be entitled and at times very needy. -Work Chairs need replacing -Workstation equipment could use some upgrades -Knowledge base(Instructions) could use a bit more attention -New employee training needs updating

avatar
Snap Technology Response
6y
Thank your kinds words. I agree that keeping workforce contingencies is always challenging as workload can increase quickly sometimes, especially with new clients onboarding. I like your advice to keep focused on investing in the employees.
1.0
Apr 1, 2025

Pretty Bad Overall

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great Colleagues: The best part of Snap Tech was the people—excluding middle managers and above. My coworkers in the service team (including its direct supervisor) and projects team were hardworking, friendly, and genuinely fun to work with. I credit them for leaving with my sanity intact. The vCIOs were a wealth of knowledge and truly nice people. They were always willing to parachute in and save beleaguered sysadmins. I thought they were super cool (still do). Builds Good Experience: That’s because it’s an MSP; there’s nothing special about Snap Tech. All MSPs expose you to a wide range of technologies and environments.

Cons

1. Arbitrary Return-to-Office Policy Snap Tech mandated an inflexible return-to-office policy (vs. hybrid WFH), despite our work being entirely doable remotely. Appointments? Family responsibilities? The hours of unpaid commuting? Gas money? All shrugged off. The hypocrisy made it worse: WFH was perfectly acceptable during on-call shifts, when it benefited them. But when it made employees’ lives easier? Then it was a problem. Cutting WFH unnecessarily complicated our lives in many ways. For me, it meant losing the flexibility to attend certain recovery meetings. The leadership’s unstated belief was that our lives outside of work didn’t matter. Any commitment to work-life balance was purely lip service. In the constrained situations they tolerated WFH, it was always begrudgingly—“you get what we give you”—instead of caring to truly meet employees’ needs. 2. Metrics The service team performance metrics were divorced from reality. They seemed to be based on business goals, irrespective of on-the-ground realities. We raised this concern at nearly every meeting, and it was consistently ignored. Naturally, many employees would therefore game the metrics to some degree. I don’t blame them. When you’re stuck between unrealistic targets and punitive middle managers, “creative accounting” is just a synonym for “job security.” Perverse incentives. 3. Pay and Promotion (or Lack Thereof) We were discouraged from discussing wages (haha). Cue the Streisand effect. The employee salaries I know fall squarely in the “lower than I thought” category. They do offer holiday bonuses and incentive pay. The bonuses aren’t insulting (or exciting). Thankfully I wasn’t around long enough to qualify for incentive pay, so I can’t comment on that. Don’t expect promotions. They fill nearly every role with external hires. I only know of two employees who were promoted internally (after jumping through an unreasonable number of hoops). 4. Double-Tap Written Warnings Several employees, myself included, were targeted with “double-tap” written warnings—two formal reprimands issued at once. A third means termination. So, you walk into a meeting thinking your job is secure and leave knowing you’re one mistake away from being fired. It’s the most toxic management tactic I’ve seen. In my case, I can remember no prior discussion, no informal guidance, no verbal warnings—my two written warnings out of nowhere. It was my first morning back after a week hospitalized and less than an hour after the insurance company refused to reimburse a cent of it. Between the incurring this huge debt and my employment being thrown into question, that morning was the worst work experience of my life. 5. On-Call and Compensation I didn’t know the details of individual contracts, but I was inadvertently told how much Snap Tech charged one client for my after-hours support. Naturally, they billed more than my hourly pay, with an added premium for after-hours work—fair enough. This is capitalism, baby. But knowing that number made me question the fairness of the entire on-call arrangement. I’ve abandoned my own birthday party, canceled therapy, and rushed out of recovery meetings to handle tickets. And for all the stress and disruption? Base pay plus zero dollars. I acknowledge our positions are salaried, but it never sat right that we made sacrifices while Snap Tech made revenue. I’d have been content if our salaries weren’t so anemic. If it’s “just part of the job,” that’s fine. Add $15,000 to each on-call worker’s salary: now it’s priced in. 6. Noncompete Agreements Snap Tech makes rank-and-file employees sign a noncompete agreement. They aren’t using groundbreaking technology and there’s no secret recipe. It’s just MSP work, using the same tools as any other MSP. The agreement seemed less about protecting the company and more about scaring employees into staying. I don’t care if it’s standard practice, pro forma, or Snap Tech doesn’t enforce it. It has caused multiple employees concern when eyeing better opportunities. I don’t think it’s right. 7. Biting My Tongue (and Internally Screaming) I had a thought several times at Snap Tech: “I am so thankful that I’m a man.” I can’t share details, because it’s not my place to tell others’ stories. But I’ve seen questionable things with my own eyes and been told much more in confidence. I’ll leave it at that.

Viewing 4 - 6 of 23 Reviews

Glassdoor has 25 Snap Technology reviews submitted anonymously by Snap Technology employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Snap Technology is right for you.