UserTesting reviews

3.1

52% would recommend to a friend

(576 total reviews)
avatar

Eric Johnson

57% approve of CEO

49% positive business outlook

UserTesting has an employee rating of 3.1 out of 5 stars, based on 576 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The UserTesting employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

576 reviews
2.0
Sep 6, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Userzoom is an essential player in a sub Industry of Tech under UX Research. UX research' importance is exploding rapidly like never before. It's the newest form of customer services and enterprises are realizing it- slowly (previously) but now at a much more rapid pace. This company doesn't offer the best solution nor the cheapest but it has a recognizable name and usually get's brought into purchasing considerations.

Cons

There are some outstanding employees at this organization, amazing people, as well as some rock-star-sales-talent. I don't know how this company attracted good talent, but it did. With that being said, every company has its fair share of carpetbaggers: this company- has more than enough of them spread throughout the sales team. A good number of the Account Executives are inexperienced, offensive to clients, and unwilling to help mentor newer SDRs *huge problem for career advancement*. This sales team isn't the typical sink or swim as it's much closer to "here's your ball and chain, now- go for a swim". Diversity at this organization only seems to be important to the members with seniority. If you aren't a part of the "original sales regime" you're better off keeping your ethnicity close to the chest. I, personally, as well as my colleagues, were mocked for being from all kinds of different ethnic backgrounds- the behaviour was condoned by higher ranking employees, senior employees and management.

2.0
Aug 19, 2017

Some great people, but TERRIBLE management style

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Good remote culture. No one ever complained about having remote folks. We got stuff done when we needed to. - Good benefits for the most part

Cons

- Zero tolerance for people who work outside of the very narrow culture spectrum - Use of Intel's OKR approach to prioritizing work has lead to enormous amount of technical debt, most of which we were often too late to implement (read: downtime) - One-on-one check-ins with managers who know nothing about what you do day to day - Protectionist culture from software engineers who have been there longer than you means subpar ideas get implemented because they trump you on tenure

avatar
UserTesting Response
8y
Thank you so much for taking the time to leave us your feedback. Since one of our core values is to get better, we always take feedback seriously and will use these points within our retrospectives to self-reflect and identify ways we can improve where needed. We’re proud of the way that we’ve been able to incorporate our remote employees so that they are productive and feel like part of the UserTesting family, and we’ve made a ton of great strides with our benefits in the past few years so that now we offer some of the most competitive benefits around, so it’s nice to hear that you valued these things as part of your experience at UserTesting. We’re very concerned that you felt like you had to work within a confined culture spectrum. We value any and all different opinions and perspectives; in fact we think that it makes our company more effective. Having said that, we do have a set of core values (get better, customers first, keep it simple, own results, be kind) that are essential to the company that we expect that all employees demonstrate. Additionally, our culture really values collaboration, openness, and teamwork and despite our best efforts in interviewing and hiring, we have found that it can be frustrating to individuals who prefers alternative work styles that aren’t conducive to what we value. We celebrate when individuals see the value and are open to improving skills in this area through mentoring and support. Likewise we are disappointed when individual preferences preclude them from improvement. Thank you so much for your opinions on OKRs. OKRs are still fairly new to us, so we admit that there is a learning curve and and we need to get better at using them. Notwithstanding the growing pains, we feel like they’re the best way to measure our goals and our success against those goals. Over the past couple of years, we have learned so much in this area and we have striven and continue to strive to continuously improve our OKR process. It was unfortunate that you did not feel that you did not get value from the one-on-ones with your manager and that you felt that they did not understand what you did day to day. Our managers care a lot about the success of their direct reports and work hard to ensure that support is meaningful. We have found that the best way for individuals day to day work to be seen and appreciated by team leads, peers, and managers is to make sure that the work that is being done is related to the work the team is doing, exists in our project management tracking tools, is reviewed in pull requests by peers, and discussed in our daily standups. We’re sorry to hear that you felt that your opinions weren’t valued because of a lack of tenure. In our industry and at our company, there are so many changes that we have to value the opinions of all of our employees, whether they’ve been here for five years or five weeks. Our Engineering Team also prides itself on its openness and collaboration. All ideas are vetted out in the open with the whole team and have to get the proper buy in before they are implemented. As a result, we are always experimenting and making decisions based on empirical data and collective experience because we know that the best ideas, no matter the tenure of the source, will win.
2.0
Jun 22, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- great people still work there in contributor roles (and a few managers) - people are genuinely friends outside of work, and the company encourages coworkers the socialize, with a family environment - lots of fun social activities that the company puts on to get employees to know each other on more than just a profession level - great office spaces in Mountain View, San Francisco and Atlanta - awesome perks including fitness classes, massages, and lunches twice a week.

Cons

- Executive Management rushes into critical decisions without consulting the experts it has hired for opinions and to do things the right way. - Product is not seen as essential to new customers, and management constantly artificially change the product without actually improving it to justify higher dollar spend than customer wants to commit. - New management hires do not fit well with the core employees who made UserTesting into the rapidly growing company it is. - Executive team is quick on the trigger to let go of key staff, while keeping other highly paid VPs and directors who are dead weight because of personal relationships. - The Executive Team feigns like they get involved into the details of the business, but really have only high-level knowledge of what's going on. - Many managers are either inexperienced, over their heads or ineffective. - Marketing team has yet to product sufficient leads for sales to realistically achieve their quotas even with outbounding.

Viewing 472 - 474 of 576 Reviews

Glassdoor has 805 UserTesting reviews submitted anonymously by UserTesting employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if UserTesting is right for you.