UserTesting reviews

3.1

52% would recommend to a friend

(576 total reviews)
avatar

Eric Johnson

57% approve of CEO

49% positive business outlook

UserTesting has an employee rating of 3.1 out of 5 stars, based on 576 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The UserTesting employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

576 reviews
1.0
May 3, 2016

Non Transparent Leadership

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people are good. Lunch provided on Tuesday and Thursday. Onsite deli with hilarious owner. Good product. Ping pong table was a great addition to the MV office.

Cons

A lot of the great people have either left or been laid off without any notice from the company. The hiring plan has been cut to nearly zero and is on a "freeze" until at least Q3/Q4. In fact, more lay offs are on the horizon due to the company wanting to become "financially fit". The client success team is over worked while being told they would hire more to help workload but that is not happening after all. There is a huge disconnect in culture between the SF and Mountain View office.

3.0
Apr 27, 2016

Casual but Cliquey

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

casual dress and lots of fun activities to do both during and outside of work

Cons

extremely cliquey and full of dramatics. workplace is full of young people who don't seem to realize that high school is over.

1.0
Mar 23, 2016

Sales review

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Easy-to-describe product. Lots of case studies and other sales collateral. Good healthcare and vision, decent dental, fair and understanding middle-management, lunches twice a week, weekly massages, matching 401k. Management is pretty flexible on work/life balance and doesn't micro-manage, which is nice.

Cons

They made the most common mistake in Silicon Valley: thinking that more sales people = more sales. See how that's working for Zenefits and a thousand other under-performing companies. Instead of creating a recurring lead generation machine, they've assigned their entire SDR team to qualify inbound leads. Instead of hiring more SDRs to do outbound lead generation by prospecting into new companies, management has doubled the size of the sales team and created two new teams out of thin air; none of which has nearly enough to do or enough leads to hit their quotas. They now expect their highest-paid employees to do the lowest-value work, which has achieved predictable results. Many reps had less than 20 demos in the entire first quarter! This has accomplished two things: lowered earnings per rep by more than 50% (nearly across the board) and caused employee morale to plummet. SDRs are desperate to hit numbers so they pass mediocre leads. AE's are desperate to hit numbers so they convert mediocre leads. If you're being hired for a sales role at UserTesting, do yourself a favor and ask to speak to a rep that was with the company prior to August 2015 to get a comparison of how things were and how they are now.

Viewing 514 - 516 of 576 Reviews

Glassdoor has 805 UserTesting reviews submitted anonymously by UserTesting employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if UserTesting is right for you.